+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of myocardial T1 mapping: A comparison of four T1 estimation algorithms for modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI)



Accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of myocardial T1 mapping: A comparison of four T1 estimation algorithms for modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI)



Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 78(5): 1746-1756



Label="PURPOSE">To compare the accuracy and precision of four different T1 estimation algorithms for modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI).Label="METHODS">Four T1 estimation algorithms, including the original fit, inversion group (IG) fit, instantaneous signal loss simulation (InSiL), and Bloch equation simulation with slice profile correction (BLESSPC) were studied. T1 estimation accuracy, precision, reproducibility, and sensitivity to heart rate (HR), flip angle (FA), and acquisition scheme (AcS) variations were compared in simulation, phantom, and volunteer studies.Label="RESULTS">T1 estimation accuracy of IG (-2.4% ± 3.9%) and original fit (-3.2% ± 1.4%) were worse than BLESSPC (0.2% ± 1.5%) and InSiL (-0.7% ± 2.1%). The original fit had the best precision for T1 from 409-1884 ms for the same FA (0.67% ± 0.16% versus 0.90% ± 0.23% using IG, 0.78% ± 0.11% using InSiL, 0.77% ± 0.12% using BLESSPC). BLESSPC generated the most consistent in vivo T1 values over different FAs and AcS, and the T1 estimation reproducibility was similar (P > 0.3) among the four methods when FA = 35°. When using FA = 50°, the reproducibility was significantly improved only when using BLESSPC (1.6% ± 0.9 versus 2.6% ± 1.9%, P < 0.05).Label="CONCLUSION">BLESSPC has superior accuracy and is the least sensitive to FA, HR, and AcS variations. T1 estimation using BLESSPC and FA = 50° is superior to conventional MOLLI with FA = 35° in accuracy and precision. Further clinical studies in varying pathological conditions are warranted to confirm our findings. Magn Reson Med 78:1746-1756, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057122053

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27917529

DOI: 10.1002/mrm.26565


Related references

Modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) for high-resolution T1 mapping of the heart. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 52(1): 141-146, 2004

Modified look-locker inversion recovery T1 mapping indices: assessment of accuracy and reproducibility between magnetic resonance scanners. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 15: 64, 2013

Inversion group (IG) fitting: A new T1 mapping method for modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) that allows arbitrary inversion groupings and rest periods (including no rest period). Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 75(6): 2332-2340, 2016

Optimization and validation of a fully-integrated pulse sequence for modified look-locker inversion-recovery (MOLLI) T1 mapping of the heart. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 26(4): 1081-1086, 2007

Quantitative assessment of hepatic function: modified look-locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) sequence for T1 mapping on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced liver MR imaging. European Radiology 26(6): 1775-1782, 2016

Influence of fat on liver T1 measurements using modified Look-Locker inversion recovery (MOLLI) methods at 3T. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 44(1): 105-111, 2016

Myocardial T 1 -mapping at 3T using saturation-recovery: reference values, precision and comparison with MOLLI. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 18(1): 84, 2016

Myocardial T1 mapping with MRI: comparison of look-locker and MOLLI sequences. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 34(6): 1367-1373, 2011

Accuracy, precision, and reproducibility of four T1 mapping sequences: a head-to-head comparison of MOLLI, ShMOLLI, SASHA, and SAPPHIRE. Radiology 272(3): 683-689, 2014

Shortened Modified Look-Locker Inversion recovery (ShMOLLI) for clinical myocardial T1-mapping at 1.5 and 3 T within a 9 heartbeat breathhold. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 12: 69, 2010

Histological Validation of measurement of diffuse interstitial myocardial fibrosis by myocardial extravascular volume fraction from Modified Look-Locker imaging (MOLLI) T1 mapping at 3 T. Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 17: 48, 2015

An analytical model which determines the apparent T 1 for Modified Look-Locker Inversion Recovery - Analysis of the longitudinal relaxation under the influence of discontinuous balanced (classical MOLLI) and spoiled gradient echo readouts. Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik 28(2): 150-157, 2018

Improved segmented modified Look-Locker inversion recovery T1 mapping sequence in mice. Plos one 12(11): E0187621, 2017

Selection of magnetization catalyzation and readout methods for modified Look-Locker inversion recovery: a T1 mapping primer. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 33(4): 363-373, 2015

Assessment of diffuse myocardial fibrosis in rats using small-animal Look-Locker inversion recovery T1 mapping. Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging 4(6): 636-640, 2011