+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Acute toxicity profile of craniospinal irradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in children with medulloblastoma: A prospective analysis



Acute toxicity profile of craniospinal irradiation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy in children with medulloblastoma: A prospective analysis



Radiation Oncology 10: 241



To report on the acute toxicity in children with medulloblastoma undergoing intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with daily intrafractionally modulated junctions. Newly diagnosed patients, aged 3-21, with standard-risk (SR) or high-risk (HR) medulloblastoma were eligible. A dose of 23.4 or 36.0 Gy in daily fractions of 1.8 Gy was prescribed to the craniospinal axis, followed by a boost to the primary tumor bed (54 or 55.8 Gy) and metastases (39.6-55.8 Gy), when indicated. Weekly, an intravenous bolus of vincristine was combined for patients with SR medulloblastoma and patients participating in the COG-ACNS-0332 study. Common toxicity criteria (CTC, version 2.0) focusing on skin, alopecia, voice changes, conjunctivitis, anorexia, dysphagia, gastro-intestinal symptoms, headache, fatigue and hematological changes were scored weekly during radiotherapy. From 2010 to 2014, data from 15 consecutive patients (SR, n = 7; HR, n = 8) were collected. Within 72 h from onset of treatment, vomiting (66 %) and headache (46 %) occurred. During week 3 of treatment, a peak incidence in constipation (33 %) and abdominal pain/cramping (40 %) was observed, but only in the subgroup of patients (n = 9) receiving vincristine (constipation: 56 vs 0 %, P = .04; pain/cramping: 67 vs 0 %, P = .03). At week 6, 73 % of the patients developed faint erythema of the cranial skin with dry desquamation (40 %) or moist desquamation confined to the skin folds of the auricle (33 %). No reaction of the skin overlying the spinal target volume was observed. Headache at onset and gastro-intestinal toxicity, especially in patients receiving weekly vincristine, were the major complaints of patients with medulloblastoma undergoing craniospinal irradiation with IMRT.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057134828

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26597178

DOI: 10.1186/s13014-015-0547-9


Related references

Patterns of Failure after Craniospinal Irradiation, Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Boost and Chemotherapy for Medulloblastoma. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*biology*physics 75(3): S507-S508, 2009

Acute toxicity of craniospinal irradiation with volumetric-modulated arc therapy in children with solid tumors. Pediatric Blood and Cancer 65(7): E27050, 2018

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy for adult craniospinal irradiation--a comparison with traditional techniques. Medical Dosimetry 38(1): 48-54, 2013

Three-Dimensional Conformal Radiation Therapy, Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy, and Helical Tomotherapy for Pediatric Craniospinal Irradiation: Dosimetric Analysis of Integral Dose. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*biology*physics 87(2): S591-S592, 2013

Estimating the excess lifetime risk of radiation induced secondary malignancy (SMN) in pediatric patients treated with craniospinal irradiation (CSI): Conventional radiation therapy versus helical intensity modulated radiation therapy. Practical Radiation Oncology 7(1): 35-41, 2016

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Compared with 3D Conformal Radiotherapy for Craniospinal Irradiation in Adults: Do We Gain Anything?. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*biology*physics 78(3): S841-S842, 2010

Comparison of a new noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiation therapy technique for craniospinal irradiation with 3 coplanar techniques. Medical Dosimetry 40(4): 296-303, 2015

Local control after craniospinal irradiation, intensity-modulated radiotherapy boost, and chemotherapy in childhood medulloblastoma. Cancer 117(3): 635-641, 2011

Local setup reproducibility of the spinal column when using intensity-modulated radiation therapy for craniospinal irradiation with patient in supine position. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics 81(5): 1552-1559, 2011

A Comparative Planning Analysis and Integral Dose of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy, Helical Tomotherapy, and Three-dimensional Conformal Craniospinal Irradiation for Pediatric Medulloblastoma. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences 46(2): 134-140, 2015

A novel schedule of accelerated partial breast radiation using intensity-modulated radiation therapy in elderly patients: survival and toxicity analysis of a prospective clinical trial. Radiation Oncology Journal 35(1): 32-38, 2017

Acute Radiation-Induced Skin Toxicity in Breast Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT): A Dosimetric Analysis. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*biology*physics 87(2): S240-S241, 2013

Clinical efficacy and safety of a highly conformal, supine, hybrid forward and inverse planned intensity modulated radiation therapy technique for craniospinal irradiation. Acta Oncologica 57(5): 629-636, 2018

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) with concurrent chemotherapy for anal cancers: Acute toxicity profile and avoidance of a treatment break. Journal of Clinical Oncology 26(15_Suppl): 15593-15593, 2016

Feasibility and Acute Toxicity of Supine Craniospinal Irradiation With Image Guided Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy in Pediatric Patients. International Journal of Radiation Oncology*biology*physics 93(3): E509-E510, 2015