+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Recall Fewer Than 50% of the Risks Discussed in the Informed Consent Process Preoperatively and the Recall Rate Worsens Significantly in the Postoperative Period

Adult Spinal Deformity Patients Recall Fewer Than 50% of the Risks Discussed in the Informed Consent Process Preoperatively and the Recall Rate Worsens Significantly in the Postoperative Period

Spine 40(14): 1079-1085

Recall of the informed consent process in patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery and their family members was investigated prospectively. To quantify the percentage recall of the most common complications discussed during the informed consent process in adult spinal deformity surgery, assess for differences between patients and family members, and correlate with mental status. Given high rates of complications in adult spinal deformity surgery, it is critical to shared decision making that patients are adequately informed about risks and are able to recall preoperative discussion of possible complications to mitigate medical legal risk. Patients undergoing adult spinal deformity surgery underwent an augmented informed consent process involving both verbal and video explanations. Recall of the 11 most common complications was scored. Mental status was assessed with the mini-mental status examination-brief version. Patients subjectively scored the informed consent process and video. After surgery, the recall test and mini-mental status examination-brief version were readministered at 5 additional time points: hospital discharge, 6 to 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively. Family members were assessed at the first 3 time points for comparison. Fifty-six patients enrolled. Despite ranking the consent process as important (median overall score: 10/10; video score: 9/10), median patient recall was only 45% immediately after discussion and video re-enforcement and subsequently declined to 18% at 6 to 8 weeks and 1 year postoperatively. Median family recall trended higher at 55% immediately and 36% at 6 to 8 weeks postoperatively. The perception of the severity of complications significantly differs between patient and surgeon. Mental status scores showed a transient, significant decrease from preoperation to discharge but were significantly higher at 1 year. Despite being well-informed in an optimized informed consent process, patients cannot recall most surgical risks discussed and recall declines over time. Significant progress remains to improve informed consent retention. 3.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057144353

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25946720

DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000000964

Related references

Recall of the Risks of Forefoot Surgery After Informed Consent. Foot & Ankle International 24(12): 904-908, 2003

Recall of the risks of forefoot surgery after informed consent. Foot and Ankle International 24(12): 904-908, 2003

The role of informed consent in risks recall in otorhinolaryngology surgeries: verbal (nonintervention) vs written (intervention) summaries of risks. American Journal of Otolaryngology 32(6): 485-489, 2012

PLD.05 Audit of Informed Consent and Recall of Risks for Caesarean Section. Archives of Disease in Childhood - Fetal and Neonatal Edition 99(Suppl 1): A107-A107, 2014

Informed Consent in Pediatric Otolaryngology: What Risks and Benefits Do Parents Recall?. Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery 155(2): 332-339, 2016

Informed consent in rhinoplasty: prospective randomized study of risk recall in patients who are given written disclosure of risks versus traditional oral discussion groups. Journal of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery 38(3): 369-374, 2009

Informed consent in trauma: does written information improve patient recall of risks? A prospective randomised study. Injury 43(9): 1534-1538, 2012

Comprehension and recall from the informed consent process by phase I healthy volunteers before dose administration. Clinical Trials 16(3): 283-289, 2019

Factors Affecting Patients Recall of Informed Consent. Anesthesiology Abstracts of Scientific Papers Annual Meeting (2001): Abstract No A-1093, 2002

Informed consent: recall by patients tested postoperatively. Connecticut Medicine 41(4): 223-225, 1977

Informed consent for clinical treatment in low-income setting: evaluating the relationship between satisfying consent and extent of recall of consent information. Bmc Medical Ethics 18(1): 69, 2017

Informed consent in neurosurgery: Patients' recall of preoperative discussion. Acta Neurochirurgica 142(3): 233-239, 2000

Patients' recall of preoperative instruction for informed consent for an operation. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume 73(2): 160-162, 1991

Patients may not recall disclosure of risk of death: implications for informed consent. Medicine Science and the Law 30(3): 259-262, 1990

Turkish and German patients' recall of diagnosis and therapy before and following informed consent. Ethnicity and Health 9(2): 213-223, 2004