+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

An Investigation into the use of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards with People with Intellectual Disabilities



An Investigation into the use of the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards with People with Intellectual Disabilities



Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities 30(4): 714-726



This small, qualitative study sought to develop a richer understanding of the way in which the deprivation of liberty safeguards (DOLS) were being used for people with intellectual disabilities. It is important to note that this study was completed prior to the changes resulting from the P v Cheshire West and Chester Council judgement. Six DOLS cases were identified and two people involved in each case were interviewed (care home managers, key workers, social workers, specialist nurses or psychologists), using semi-structured interviews. The data were analysed using grounded theory techniques. The interviewees described DOLS as providing a framework leading to positive outcomes for the people they supported, in some cases avoiding inpatient stays. However, they had a number of concerns including lack of knowledge and training, potential under use of DOLS and disappointment with case law. Overall, these findings are encouraging in regard to the specific individuals for whom DOLS applications were made; however, they also highlight the need for a stronger agenda regarding wider dissemination of information, and training about DOLS, as well as some reform.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057174204

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27349216

DOI: 10.1111/jar.12266


Related references

Deprivation of liberty safeguards were supposed to protect people. Mental Health Today 2009: 34, 2009

The Mental Capacity Act 2005 Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards and people with dementia: the implications for social care regulation. Health and Social Care in the Community 17(4): 415-422, 2009

Deprivation of liberty. Liberty safeguards in hospital. Bmj 338: B2430, 2009

Deprivation of liberty safeguards. British Journal of Community Nursing 13(11): 532-537, 2008

Deprivation of liberty safeguards: how prepared are we?. Journal of Medical Ethics 36(3): 170-173, 2010

How to apply Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. Nursing Times 109(20): 12-14, 2013

The use of deprivation of liberty safeguards in hospitals to increase. British Journal of Nursing 23(8): 434-435, 2014

The Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards: observations and limitations. Medicine Science and the Law 51(4): 187-192, 2011

Consultation announced on Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. Nursing Older People 27(7): 6-6, 2015

The use of the Mental Capacity Act Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. British Journal of Nursing 22(12): 712-713, 2013

When do I need to consider requesting a Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards authorization?. Nursing Older people 27(8): 14, 2015

The death of deprivation of liberty safeguards DOLS?. Social Care and Neurodisability 3(2): 56-63, 2012

Deprivation of liberty safeguards and the Mental Capacity Act. Bmj 338: B1888, 2009

Implications of a new case law on the Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards. Medicine Science and the Law 50(4): 217-219, 2010

Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards: ethical and clinical implications. British Journal of Hospital Medicine 76(4): 230-233, 2015