+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Aortic Angulation Attenuates Procedural Success Following Self-Expandable But Not Balloon-Expandable TAVR

Aortic Angulation Attenuates Procedural Success Following Self-Expandable But Not Balloon-Expandable TAVR

Jacc. Cardiovascular Imaging 9(8): 964-972

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of increased aortic angulation (AA) on acute procedural success following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The degree of angulation between the aorta and the heart can make accurate positioning of the bioprosthesis during TAVR more demanding, particularly in instances of an extremely angulated or horizontal aortic root. Nonetheless, there are limited data on the impact of AA on the acute success of TAVR. We assessed 582 patients who underwent TAVR at our institute and had contrast computed tomography available for AA evaluation. TAVR endpoints, device success, and adverse events were considered according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium-2 definitions. The mean angulation of the aorta was 47.3 ± 8.7°. Patients were therefore divided into 2 groups: AA <48° and AA ≥48°. AA in the 480 patients who underwent balloon-expandable (BE) TAVR did not influence acute procedural success or short-term clinical outcome. In contrast, increased AA among the 102 patients who underwent self-expandable (SE) TAVR was found to significantly attenuate procedural success (area under the curve: 0.73; 95% confidence interval: 0.61 to 0.85; p = 0.008). The numerical cutoff for AA with the highest sum of sensitivity and specificity for device success was ≥48° (sensitivity 85%, specificity 61%). Moreover, patients whose AA was ≥48° were also associated with an increased need for a second valve and post-dilation, had increased fluoroscopy time and increased valve embolization, and had increased post-procedural paravalvular regurgitation greater than or equal to mild following SE TAVR. Major complications at 30 days, including mortality were similar between AA groups. Six-month mortality was also similar between both AA groups. Increased aortic root angulation adversely influences acute procedural success following SE but not BE TAVR. Because of these data, BE valves may be preferred when evaluating patients with high AA before TAVR.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057218242

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27424244

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcmg.2016.02.030

Related references

Aortic Angulation Does Not Impact Outcomes in Self-Expandable or Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. Cardiology 140(2): 96-102, 2018

Tct-514 Balloon-expandable Sapien 3 29mm versus self-expandable Evolut R 34mm in Tavr patients with a large annulus: Is there a difference in performance and risk of cerebral embolization?. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 72(13): B206-B207, 2018

TAVR with mechanically expandable prostheses: Is balloon aortic valvuloplasty really necessary?. International Journal of Cardiology 246: 37-40, 2018

Aortic annulus eccentricity before and after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: comparison of balloon-expandable and self-expandable prostheses. European Heart Journal 34(Suppl 1): P271-P271, 2013

Comparison of hemodynamic performance of self-expandable CoreValve versus balloon-expandable Edwards SAPIEN aortic valves inserted by catheter for aortic stenosis. American Journal of Cardiology 111(7): 1026-1033, 2013

Long-term outcomes with balloon-expandable and self-expandable prostheses in patients undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic stenosis. International Journal of Cardiology 2019, 2019

Clinical outcomes of self-expandable vs. balloon-expandable TAVI for severe aortic stenosis. Acta Cardiologica 2019: 1-8, 2019

A Novel Transcarotid Approach for Implantation of Balloon-Expandable or Self-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valves. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 32(12): 1575.E9-1575.E12, 2016

Comparison of balloon-expandable versus self-expandable valves for transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients with low-gradient severe aortic stenosis and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. American Journal of Cardiology 115(6): 810-815, 2015

Postprocedural aortic regurgitation in balloon-expandable and self-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement procedures: analysis of predictors and impact on long-term mortality: insights from the FRANCE2 Registry. Circulation 129(13): 1415-1427, 2014

Comparative meta-analysis of balloon-expandable and self-expandable valves for transcatheter aortic valve replacement. International Journal of Cardiology 197: 87-97, 2016

AS-040 Observed New Onset of Heart Block in the Self-Expandable and Balloon-Expandable Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation. American Journal of Cardiology 107(8-Supp-S): 17-0, 2011

Anatomical and procedural features associated with aortic root rupture during balloon-expandable transcatheter aortic valve replacement. Circulation 128(3): 244-253, 2013

Comparison of Outcomes of Balloon-Expandable Versus Self-Expandable Transcatheter Heart Valves for Severe Aortic Stenosis. American Journal of Cardiology 119(7): 1094-1099, 2017

Meta-analysis of comparison between self-expandable and balloon-expandable valves for patients having transcatheter aortic valve implantation. American Journal of Cardiology 115(12): 1720-1725, 2015