EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

Assay for estimating total bacterial load: relative qPCR normalisation of bacterial load with associated clinical implications



Assay for estimating total bacterial load: relative qPCR normalisation of bacterial load with associated clinical implications



Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 83(1): 1-6



Relative microorganism abundance is a parameter describing biodiversity, referring to how common a bacterial species is within the total bacterial flora. Anal, rectal, skin, mucal, and respiratory swabs are typical clinical samples where knowledge of relative bacterial abundance might make distinction between asymptomatic carriers and symptomatic cases. Assays trying to measure total bacterial load are usually based on the amplification of universal segments of 16S rRNA genes. Previous assays were not adoptable to "direct" PCR protocols, and/or they were not compatible with hydrolysis-based detection. Using the latest summary of universal 16S sequence motifs present in literature and testing our design with 500 liquid and 50 formed stool samples, we illustrate the performance characteristics of a new 16S quantitative PCR (qPCR) assay, which addresses well-known technical problems, including a) positive priming reaction in the absence of intended target due to self-priming and/or mispriming of unintended targets; b) amplification bias due to nonoptimal primer/probe coverage; and c) too large amplicons for clinical qPCR. Stool swabs ranked into bins of different bacterial loads show significant correlation with threshold cycle values of our new assay. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first description of qPCR assay measuring individual differences of total bacterial load present in human stool.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057236564

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26008123

DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2015.04.005



Related references

Studies of ph acidity thermoduric bacterial load and thermophilic bacterial load with reference to keeping quality of market milk. Indian Veterinary Journal 67(5): 448-452, 1990

Evaluation of universal probes and primer sets for assessing total bacterial load in clinical samples: general implications and practical use in endodontic antimicrobial therapy. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 43(10): 5332-5337, 2005

Molecular bacterial load assay, a culture-free biomarker for rapid and accurate quantification of sputum Mycobacterium tuberculosis bacillary load during treatment. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 49(11): 3905-3911, 2012

Determination of bacterial load in house dust using qPCR, chemical markers and culture. Journal of Environmental Monitoring 12(3): 759-768, 2010

The magnitude of bacterial load at the site of disease following different bacterial infections in childhood implications of the mechanisms of pathogenesis. Pediatric Research 20(4 PART 2): 314A, 1986

Total protein concentration and total bacterial load as measures of residual interproximal plaque in comparative clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 35(1): 23-30, 2007

Molecular diagnosis of bacterial vaginosis: Does adjustment for total bacterial load or human cellular content improve diagnostic performance?. Journal of Microbiological Methods 133: 66-68, 2017

Discordance in Xpert® MTB/RIF assay results among low bacterial load clinical specimens in Bangladesh. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease 22(9): 1056-1062, 2018

Decontamination of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequence datasets based on bacterial load assessment by qPCR. Bmc Microbiology 16(): 73-73, 2016

Evaluation of a Multiplex Real-Time PCR Assay for Detecting Major Bacterial Enteric Pathogens in Fecal Specimens: Intestinal Inflammation and Bacterial Load Are Correlated in Campylobacter Infections. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 54(9): 2262-2266, 2016

False-positive rifampin resistant results with Xpert MTB/RIF version 4 assay in clinical samples with a low bacterial load. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 85(1): 53-55, 2016

The value of the one-hour resazurin test for estimating the bacterial load of milk in warm countries. S African J Agr Sci 9(2): 355-364, 1966

Total Antioxidant Capacity and Total Oxidant Status in Saliva of Periodontitis Patients in Relation to Bacterial Load. Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology 5: 97-97, 2016

How low can we go? The implications of low bacterial load in respiratory microbiota studies. Pneumonia 10: 7-7, 2018

The combined use of wash load and bed material load rating curves for the calculation of total load: an example from the Burdekin River, Australia. Catena 6(3-4): 317-329, 1979