+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Assistive technology use by disability type and race: exploration of a population-based health survey



Assistive technology use by disability type and race: exploration of a population-based health survey



Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 2015: 1-9



To examine the relationships among Assistive Technology (AT) use, race, type of disability and selected other demographic characteristics. Using 2009 National Health Interview Survey, descriptive statistics, statistical interactions and binary logistic regression were performed to identify, contrast and predict the likelihood of using AT based on the type of disability among African Americans (AAs) and European Americans (EAs). We found that more AAs (10% within group proportion of total AAs) used AT compared to EAs (7.5% within group proportion of total EAs). Physical (p < 0.001), auditory (p = 0.028) and emotional (p = 0.008) impairments were statistically significant predictors of AT use. However, physical impairment as a predictor of AT use was greater among AAs (OR = 222.49, CI: 64.04-773.04, p < 0.001) than EAs (OR = 50.77, CI: 31.78-81.12, p < 0.001). EAs had a greater number of disabling conditions that predict the use of AT than AAs, whereas AAs had more demographic characteristics beyond race that predict AT use than EAs. Disparities were observed in AT usage by disability types and demographic characteristics between AAs and EAs. Moreover, the predictive strength of AT usage based on disability types and other demographic variables differed by races. Overall, the findings about the different relationships among race, disability type, and AT use are found. Implications for Rehabilitation The finding may inform the development of initiatives by rehabilitation leaders to encourage the use of AT by AAs and EAs according to their type of impairment. Having identified physical impairment as statistically significant predictor of AT use greater among AAs, rehabilitation leaders should ensure that people living with those types of disability have access to the corresponding type of AT and can use them effectively.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057246552

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26414744

DOI: 10.3109/17483107.2015.1090487


Related references

Assistive technology device classification based upon the World Health Organization's, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 6(3): 243-259, 2011

Assistive technology access and service delivery in resource-limited environments: introduction to a special issue of Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 10(4): 267-270, 2016

Redefining Assistive Technology, Accessibility and Disability Based on Recent Technical Advances. Journal of Technology in Human Services 25(1-2): 147-158, 2007

Exploration of health perceptions and assistive technology use by driving status as related to transportation independence in New Delhi, India. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 7(4): 314-322, 2012

The role of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health and quality criteria for improving assistive technology service delivery in Europe. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation 91(13 Suppl 1): S55-S61, 2012

Social stratification, development and health in Pakistan: an empirical exploration of relationships in population-based national health examination survey data. Social Science and Medicine 57(10): 1863-1874, 2003

The abandonment of assistive technology in Italy: a survey of National Health Service users. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine 52(4): 516-526, 2017

Home Features and Assistive Technology for the Home-Bound Elderly in a Thai Suburban Community by Applying the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Journal of Aging Research 2017: 2865960, 2017

General exposures to prescription medications by race/ethnicity in a population-based sample: results from the Boston Area Community Health Survey. Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety 19(4): 384-392, 2010

The intersection of culture, disability and assistive technology. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 6(2): 87-96, 2011

Disability and rehabilitation: assistive technology. Introduction. Disability and Rehabilitation. Assistive Technology 3(6): 293-294, 2009

Assistive technology for people with neurological disability. Neurorehabilitation 28(3): 181-182, 2011

Introduction. The importance of aging with a disability to assistive technology. Assistive Technology 11(2): 81-83, 2000

Predictors of Seniors' Interest in Assistive Applications on Smartphones: Evidence from a Population-Based Survey in Slovenia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 16(9), 2019

Assistive/rehabilitation technology, disability, and service delivery models. Cognitive Processing 13 Suppl 1: S75-S78, 2013