+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Availability of structured and unstructured clinical data for comparative effectiveness research and quality improvement: a multisite assessment



Availability of structured and unstructured clinical data for comparative effectiveness research and quality improvement: a multisite assessment



Egems 2(1): 1079



A key attribute of a learning health care system is the ability to collect and analyze routinely collected clinical data in order to quickly generate new clinical evidence, and to monitor the quality of the care provided. To achieve this vision, clinical data must be easy to extract and stored in computer readable formats. We conducted this study across multiple organizations to assess the availability of such data specifically for comparative effectiveness research (CER) and quality improvement (QI) on surgical procedures. This study was conducted in the context of the data needed for the already established Surgical Care and Outcomes Assessment Program (SCOAP), a clinician-led, performance benchmarking, and QI registry for surgical and interventional procedures in Washington State. We selected six hospitals, managed by two Health Information Technology (HIT) groups, and assessed the ease of automated extraction of the data required to complete the SCOAP data collection forms. Each data element was classified as easy, moderate, or complex to extract. Overall, a significant proportion of the data required to automatically complete the SCOAP forms was not stored in structured computer-readable formats, with more than 75 percent of all data elements being classified as moderately complex or complex to extract. The distribution differed significantly between the health care systems studied. Although highly desirable, a learning health care system does not automatically emerge from the implementation of electronic health records (EHRs). Innovative methods to improve the structured capture of clinical data are needed to facilitate the use of routinely collected clinical data for patient phenotyping.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 057275108

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25848594


Related references

Preparing Electronic Clinical Data for Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research: The SCOAP CERTAIN Automation and Validation Project. Egems 1(1): 1025, 2013

A pragmatic framework for single-site and multisite data quality assessment in electronic health record-based clinical research. Medical Care 50 Suppl: S21-S29, 2012

Lessons from the Electronic Data Methods Forum: collaboration at the frontier of comparative effectiveness research, patient-centered outcomes research, and quality improvement. Medical Care 51(8 Suppl 3): S1-S3, 2013

Data quality assessment for comparative effectiveness research in distributed data networks. Medical Care 51(8 Suppl 3): S22-S29, 2013

Using primary care electronic health record data for comparative effectiveness research: experience of data quality assessment and preprocessing in The Netherlands. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 5(4): 345-354, 2018

A medical informatics perspective on decision support: toward a unified research paradigm combining biological vs. clinical, empirical vs. legacy, and structured vs. unstructured data. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2012: 96-98, 2012

Collection and retrieval of structured clinical data from electronic patient records in general practice. A first-phase study to create a health care database for research and quality assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 22(1): 6-10, 2004

Web-based Comparative Patient-reported Outcome Feedback to Support Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research in Total Joint Replacement. Egems 2(1): 1130, 2014

Data integration of structured and unstructured sources for assigning clinical codes to patient stays. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 23(E1): E11-E19, 2016

Clinical quality registries: engaging effectiveness data for quality improvement. American Journal of Public Health 104(12): E10, 2015

ODaCCI: Ontology-guided Data Curation for Multisite Clinical Research Data Integration in the NINDS Center for SUDEP Research. AMIA ... Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium 2016: 441-450, 2017

Using structured data entry systems in the electronic medical record to collect clinical data for quality and research: Can we efficiently serve multiple needs for complex patients with spina bifida?. Journal of Pediatric Rehabilitation Medicine 2018, 2018

Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum building the infrastructure to conduct comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research using electronic clinical data. Medical Care 50 Suppl: Ii, 2012

Electronic multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (eMDHAQ): past, present and future of a proposed single data management system for clinical care, research, quality improvement, and monitoring of long-term outcomes. Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology 34(5 Suppl 101): S17-S33, 2016

Identifying appropriate reference data models for comparative effectiveness research (CER) studies based on data from clinical information systems. Medical Care 51(8 Suppl 3): S45-S52, 2013