+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Biological Control Activities of Rice-Associated Bacillus sp. Strains against Sheath Blight and Bacterial Panicle Blight of Rice



Biological Control Activities of Rice-Associated Bacillus sp. Strains against Sheath Blight and Bacterial Panicle Blight of Rice



Plos one 11(1): E0146764



Potential biological control agents for two major rice diseases, sheath blight and bacterial panicle blight, were isolated from rice plants in this study. Rice-associated bacteria (RABs) isolated from rice plants grown in the field were tested for their antagonistic activities against the rice pathogens, Rhizoctonia solani and Burkholderia glumae, which cause sheath blight and bacterial panicle blight, respectively. Twenty-nine RABs were initially screened based on their antagonistic activities against both R. solani and B. glumae. In follow-up retests, 26 RABs of the 29 RABs were confirmed to have antimicrobial activities, but the rest three RABs did not reproduce any observable antagonistic activity against R. solani or B. glumae. According to16S rDNA sequence identity, 12 of the 26 antagonistic RABs were closest to Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, while seven RABs were to B. methylotrophicus and B, subtilis, respectively. The 16S rDNA sequences of the three non-antagonistic RABs were closest to Lysinibacillus sphaericus (RAB1 and RAB12) and Lysinibacillus macroides (RAB5). The five selected RABs showing highest antimicrobial activities (RAB6, RAB9, RAB16, RAB17S, and RAB18) were closest to B. amyloliquefaciens in DNA sequence of 16S rDNA and gyrB, but to B. subtilis in that of recA. These RABs were observed to inhibit the sclerotial germination of R. solani on potato dextrose agar and the lesion development on detached rice leaves by artificial inoculation of R. solani. These antagonistic RABs also significantly suppressed the disease development of sheath blight and bacterial panicle blight in a field condition, suggesting that they can be potential biological control agents for these rice diseases. However, these antagonistic RABs showed diminished disease suppression activities in the repeated field trial conducted in the following year probably due to their reduced antagonistic activities to the pathogens during the long-term storage in -70C, suggesting that development of proper storage methods to maintain antagonistic activity is as crucial as identification of new biological control agents.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 057304786

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26765124


Related references

Biological control of rice sheath blight in India: Lack of correlation between chitinase production by bacterial antagonists and sheath blight suppression. Plant & Soil 160(2): 277-280, 1994

Water-soluble granules containing Bacillus megaterium for biological control of rice sheath blight formulation, bacterial viability and efficacy testing. World Journal Of Microbiology & Biotechnology: 11, 2499-2507, 2008

Biological control of sheath blight of rice by Bacillus sp. Chinese Journal of Biological Control 16(4): 160-162, 2000

Biological control of rice sheath blight by Bacillus cereus R2. Acta Phytopathologica Sinica 23(2): 101-105, 1993

Ecological studies on rice sheath blight caused by Rhizoctonia solani II. Forecasting and control of rice sheath blight. Korean Journal of Plant Protection 22(1): 21-25, 1983

Evaluation of resistance of the cryAb gene transgenic rice Kemingdao against rice bacterial leaf blight and sheath blight disease. Plant Protection 29(6): 27-28, 2003

Severity of rice blast bacterial blight and sheath blight in rice after application with herbicides and insecticides. Philippine Agriculturist 61(1-2): 1-11, 1977

Suppression of sheath blight development in rice and sclerotia germination of Rhizoctonia solani by rice-associated strains of Bacillus spp. Phytopathology 103(5): 9-10, 2013

Integrated biological and chemical control of rice sheath blight by Bacillus subtilis NJ-18 and jinggangmycin. Pest Management Science 70(2): 258-263, 2014

Biological control of sheath blight of rice with the fermented product B-916 (Bacillus subtilis) in China. CRRN, Chinese Rice Research Newsletter 8(2): 7, 2000

Effervescent fast-disintegrating bacterial formulation for biological control of rice sheath blight. Journal of Controlled Release 119(2): 229-235, 2007

Biological control of Rhizoctonia solani AG1-1A, the causal agent of rice sheath blight with Trichoderma strains. Phytopathologia Mediterranea 49(3): 287-300, 2010

Enhancement of biological control by combination of fluorescent pseudomonad strains and resistance inducers against sheath blight of rice. 2008

Evaluation of chitinase production as a criterion for selecting bacterial antagonists for biological control of rice sheath blight shb. International Rice Research Newsletter 17(1): 25-26, 1992

Biological control of sheath blight of rice: Induction of systemic resistance in rice by plant-associated Pseudomonas spp. Current Science 72(5): 331-334, 1997