+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data



CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data



International Journal of Medical Informatics 84(10): 763-773



Comparative effectiveness research (CER) requires the capture and analysis of data from disparate sources, often from a variety of institutions with diverse electronic health record (EHR) implementations. In this paper we describe the CER Hub, a web-based informatics platform for developing and conducting research studies that combine comprehensive electronic clinical data from multiple health care organizations. The CER Hub platform implements a data processing pipeline that employs informatics standards for data representation and web-based tools for developing study-specific data processing applications, providing standardized access to the patient-centric electronic health record (EHR) across organizations. The CER Hub is being used to conduct two CER studies utilizing data from six geographically distributed and demographically diverse health systems. These foundational studies address the effectiveness of medications for controlling asthma and the effectiveness of smoking cessation services delivered in primary care. The CER Hub includes four key capabilities: the ability to process and analyze both free-text and coded clinical data in the EHR; a data processing environment supported by distributed data and study governance processes; a clinical data-interchange format for facilitating standardized extraction of clinical data from EHRs; and a library of shareable clinical data processing applications. CER requires coordinated and scalable methods for extracting, aggregating, and analyzing complex, multi-institutional clinical data. By offering a range of informatics tools integrated into a framework for conducting studies using EHR data, the CER Hub provides a solution to the challenges of multi-institutional research using electronic medical record data.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057336316

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26138036

DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.06.002


Related references

CC4-01: CER-HUB: An Informatics Platform for Conducting Comparative Effectiveness Research with Comprehensive Electronic Medical Record Data. Clinical Medicine & Research 10(3): 157-158, 2012

A survey of informatics platforms that enable distributed comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional heterogenous clinical data. Medical Care 50 Suppl: S49-S59, 2012

Informatics grand challenges in multi-institutional comparative effectiveness research. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 1(5): 373-376, 2014

Electronic Data Methods (EDM) forum building the infrastructure to conduct comparative effectiveness research and patient-centered outcomes research using electronic clinical data. Medical Care 50 Suppl: Ii, 2012

Novel approach to utilizing electronic health records for dermatologic research: developing a multi-institutional federated data network for clinical and translational research in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis. Dermatology Online Journal 18(5): 2, 2012

Enhancing Comparative Effectiveness Research With Automated Pediatric Pneumonia Detection in a Multi-Institutional Clinical Repository: A PHIS+ Pilot Study. Journal of Medical Internet Research 19(5): E162, 2017

Opportunities and challenges for comparative effectiveness research (CER) with Electronic Clinical Data: a perspective from the EDM forum. Medical Care 50 Suppl: S11-S18, 2012

Ethics and informed consent for comparative effectiveness research with prospective electronic clinical data. Medical Care 51(8 Suppl 3): S53-S57, 2013

Information Technology for Clinical, Translational and Comparative Effectiveness Research. Findings from the Yearbook 2015 Section on Clinical Research Informatics. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 10(1): 178-182, 2017

Information technology for clinical, translational and comparative effectiveness research. Findings from the section clinical research informatics. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 9: 224-227, 2016

Enabling comparative effectiveness research with informatics: show me the data!. Academic Radiology 18(9): 1072-1076, 2011

A tall order on a tight timeframe: stakeholder perspectives on comparative effectiveness research using electronic clinical data. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 1(5): 441-451, 2014

Preparing Electronic Clinical Data for Quality Improvement and Comparative Effectiveness Research: The SCOAP CERTAIN Automation and Validation Project. Egems 1(1): 1025, 2013

Clinical research informatics and electronic health record data. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 9: 215-223, 2016

"Ten commandments" for conducting comparative effectiveness research using "real-world data". Journal of Managed Care Pharmacy 17(9 Suppl A): S10-S15, 2012