+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Cognitive Patient Education for Low Back Pain in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis



Cognitive Patient Education for Low Back Pain in Primary Care: A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis



Spine 41(6): 455-462



A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care. The aim of this study was to estimate the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a cognitive-based education program on patients with subacute or chronic low back pain (LBP) in primary care, compared to usual treatment, provided by general practitioners (GP) and physiotherapists (PT). Patient education has been reported to have a favorable effect on patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. In this study, an "Explain Pain" model was adapted to fit into an ordinary clinical setting in Norwegian primary care. Sixteen GPs and 20 PTs participated in the study and a total of 216 patients were recruited. The GPs and PTs were randomly assigned to provide either a cognitive patient education or usual treatment. All patients in both groups were provided with four consultations of 30 min with their provider during the study. In the intervention group the patients were educated according to a specific manual written for the purpose of this study. Eighty-one percent responded at 4-week, and 68% at the 12-month follow-up. There was a substantial improvement in function, pain, and sick leave in both groups. After 4 weeks the intervention group scored 0.51 RMDQ points lower than the control group (Beta -0.506 [95% CI -1.76-0.75]). After 12 months the intervention group scored 0.66 RMDQ points higher than the control group (Beta 0.66 [95% CI -0.56-1.88]). There was no significant difference in QALYs in the two treatment groups; the estimated difference was 0.005 (-0.016-0.027) in favor of the intervention. This study showed no clinical or health economic benefits as a result of adding a cognitive education program to usual treatment for patients with subacute and chronic LBP. Potential weaknesses such as a long recruiting period and potentially low compliance with the cognitive intervention warrant a careful interpretation of the results.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057435991

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26966970

DOI: 10.1097/brs.0000000000001268


Related references

The COPE LBP trial: cognitive patient education for low back pain--a cluster randomized controlled trial in primary care. Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders 11: 33, 2010

Group cognitive behavioural treatment for low-back pain in primary care: a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet 375(9718): 916-923, 2010

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness analysis of neuroreflexotherapy for subacute and chronic low back pain in routine general practice: a cluster randomized, controlled trial. Spine 27(11): 1149-1159, 2002

Randomized trial of two physiotherapy interventions for primary care back and neck pain patients: cost effectiveness analysis. Rheumatology 46(9): 1495-1501, 2007

Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of neuromuscular exercise and back care counseling in female healthcare workers with recurrent non-specific low back pain: a blinded four-arm randomized controlled trial. Bmc Public Health 18(1): 1376, 2018

A multi-center, randomized controlled clinical trial, cost-effectiveness and qualitative research of electroacupuncture with usual care for patients with non-acute pain after back surgery: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 19(1): 65, 2018

Stratified patient-centered care in type 2 diabetes: a cluster-randomized, controlled clinical trial of effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Diabetes Care 36(10): 3054-3061, 2013

Evaluation of individualized quality of life and illness perceptions in low back pain. A patient education cluster randomized controlled trial. Patient Education and Counseling 99(12): 1992-1998, 2016

A cluster randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of intermediate care clinics for diabetes (ICCD): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 13: 164, 2012

Cost-effectiveness of acupuncture versus standard care for pelvic and low back pain in pregnancy: A randomized controlled trial. Plos one 14(4): E0214195, 2019

Cost-Effectiveness of a Proactive Primary Care Program for Frail Older People: A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 18(12): 1029-1036.E3, 2017

A Cluster-Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating the Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Tobacco Cessation on Prescription in Swedish Primary Health Care: A Protocol of the Motivation 2 Quit (M2Q) Study. Jmir Research Protocols 5(3): E188, 2016

Determining the impact of a new physiotherapist-led primary care model for back pain: protocol for a pilot cluster randomized controlled trial. Trials 18(1): 526, 2017

The effectiveness of training physical therapists in pain neuroscience education on patient reported outcomes for patients with chronic spinal pain: a study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial. Bmc Musculoskeletal Disorders 19(1): 386, 2018

A focus group study to understand biases and confounders in a cluster randomized controlled trial on low back pain in primary care in Norway. Bmc Family Practice 19(1): 71, 2018