+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparative effectiveness of outpatient cardiovascular disease and diabetes care delivery between advanced practice providers and physician providers in primary care: Implications for care under the Affordable Care Act



Comparative effectiveness of outpatient cardiovascular disease and diabetes care delivery between advanced practice providers and physician providers in primary care: Implications for care under the Affordable Care Act



American Heart Journal 181: 74-82



The objective was to compare quality of diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) care between advanced practice providers (APPs) and physicians in a primary care setting. We identified diabetes (n=1,022,588) and CVD (n=1,187,035) patients receiving primary care between October 2013 and September 2014 in 130 Veterans Affairs facilities. We compared glycemic control (hemoglobin A1c <7%) in diabetic patients, blood pressure (BP) <140/90 mmHg in diabetic or CVD patients, cholesterol control (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol<100 mg/dL, receiving a statin) in diabetic or CVD patients, and those receiving a β-blocker (with history of myocardial infarction in the last 2 years) among patients receiving care from physicians and APPs. We also compared the proportion meeting composite measure (glycemic, BP, and cholesterol control in diabetic patients; BP, cholesterol control, and receipt of β-blocker among eligible CVD patients). Diabetic patients receiving care from APPs were statistically more likely to have glycemic (50% vs 51.4%, odds ratio [OR] 1.06 [1.05-1.08]) and BP control (77.5% vs 78.4%, OR 1.04 [1.03-1.06]), whereas patients receiving care from physicians were more likely to have cholesterol control (receipt of statin 68% vs 66.5%, OR 0.94 [0.93-0.95]) in adjusted models, although these differences are not clinically significant. Similar results were seen in CVD patients. Few patients met the composite measure (27.1% and 27.6% of diabetic and 54.0% and 54.8% of CVD patients receiving care from physicians and APPs, respectively). Diabetes and CVD care quality was comparable between physicians and APPs with clinically insignificant differences. Regardless of provider type, there is a need to improve performance on eligible measures in diabetes or CVD patients.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057457295

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27823696

DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2016.07.020


Related references

Health Care Resource Utilization for Outpatient Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Care Delivery Among Advanced Practice Providers and Physician Providers in Primary Care. Population Health Management 21(3): 209-216, 2017

Primary Care Providers' Views of Recent Trends in Health Care Delivery and Payment. Findings from the Commonwealth Fund/Kaiser Family Foundation 2015 National Survey of Primary Care Providers. Issue Brief 24: 1-13, 2015

Whom should we profile? Examining diabetes care practice variation among primary care providers, provider groups, and health care facilities. Health Services Research 37(5): 1159-1180, 2002

Don't fumble the handoff. Inpatient providers, specialists, and the primary care physician: a medical care delivery system with benefits and complex risks. Journal of the Medical Association of Georgia 96(3): 23-24, 2008

Treatment in a preventive cardiology clinic utilizing advanced practice providers effectively closes atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk-management gaps among a primary-prevention population compared with a propensity-matched primary-care cohort: A team-based care model and its impact on lipid and blood pressure management. Clinical Cardiology 41(6): 817-824, 2018

Utilization and impact on fellowship training of non-physician advanced practice providers in intensive care units of academic medical centers: a survey of critical care program directors. Journal of Critical Care 29(1): 112-115, 2014

Knowledge and practice related to gestational diabetes among primary health care providers in Morocco: Potential for a defragmentation of care?. Primary Care Diabetes 11(4): 389-396, 2017

Health Care Disparities and Diabetes Care: Practical Considerations for Primary Care Providers. Clinical Diabetes 27(3): 105-112, 2009

Frequency and predictors of missed visits to primary care and eye care providers for annually recommended diabetes preventive care services over a two-year period among U.S. adults with diabetes. Preventive Medicine 105: 257-264, 2017

How the Affordable Care Act will strengthen primary care and benefit patients, providers, and payers. Issue Brief 1: 1-28, 2011

Practice nurses as main care-providers for patients with type 2 diabetes in a primary care setting: a randomized controlled trial. 2007

Projecting the Impact of the Affordable Care Act Provisions on Accessibility and Availability of Primary Care Providers for the Adult Population in Georgia. American Journal of Public Health 106(8): 1470-1476, 2017

Specialist palliative care service responsibility to support primary care providers in care planning and end of life care a review. BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care 3(2): 279-280, 2013

Shared mental models of patients, oncology providers, and primary care providers regarding roles in cancer survivorship care. Western Journal of Nursing Research 36(10): 1384-1385, 2016

What Primary Care Providers Want to Learn to Improve the Care of Their Adolescent Patients: A Survey of Providers in Western New York. Journal of Adolescent Health 58(2): S42-S43, 2016