+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparison of short-term outcomes between prone and lateral decubitus positions for thoracoscopic esophagectomy

Comparison of short-term outcomes between prone and lateral decubitus positions for thoracoscopic esophagectomy

Surgical Endoscopy 29(9): 2756-2762

Prone thoracoscopic esophagectomy was introduced at our institution from 2012. This study describes our experiences of the main differences between thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone and traditional left lateral decubitus positions together with an analysis of the short-term surgical outcomes. In total, 87 patients undergoing thoracoscopic esophagectomy between January 2012 and October 2013 at Tohoku University Hospital were enrolled; of these, 54 and 33 patients were operated in the prone (Group P) and lateral decubitus (Group L) positions, respectively. The background of the patients was similar, and there was no in-hospital mortality. There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of whole surgical duration, thoracic duration, and number of dissected lymph nodes. Total blood loss and thoracic estimated blood loss were significantly lower in Group P than Group L. Furthermore, postoperative pulmonary complications, intensive care unit stay, and hospital stay were significantly lower in Group P. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position is feasible and safe. The prone position technique may be superior to conventional lateral decubitus position esophagectomy.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057470872

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25480621

DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-4003-y

Related references

Comparison of the short-term postoperative results of prone positioning and lateral decubitus positioning during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. Wideochirurgia i Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne 10(1): 37-43, 2015

Clinical utility of a novel hybrid position combining the left lateral decubitus and prone positions during thoracoscopic esophagectomy. World Journal of Surgery 38(2): 410-418, 2014

Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surgical Endoscopy 22(11): 2485-2491, 2008

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position versus in the lateral position for patients with esophageal cancer: a comparison of short-term surgical results. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 24(2): 158-163, 2014

Should thoracoscopic three-stage esophagectomy be performed in the prone or left lateral decubitus position?. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 13(1): 60-65, 2011

Comparison of Anesthetic Management of Complete Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in the Prone Position and Video-assisted Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy with Mini-thoracotomy in the Left Lateral Position. The Journal Of Japan Society For Clinical Anesthesia 36(4): 399-403, 2016

Short-term outcomes and one surgeon's learning curve for thoracoscopic esophagectomy performed with the patient in the prone position. Surgery Today 47(3): 313-319, 2016

Comparison of the short-term outcomes of patients with esophageal cancer after subtotal esophagectomy via thoracoscopy in left lateral position and in prone position. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 15(9): 950-953, 2014

Comparison of perioperative outcomes and lymphadenectomy after thoracoscopic esophagectomy in semi prone position and open esophagectomy. Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi 36(11): 863-866, 2015

Short-term postoperative superiority and 5-year follow-up outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy for treatment of esophageal carcinoma: a historical comparison with conventional open esophagectomy under a single experienced surgeon. Esophagus 11(1): 54-63, 2014

Comparison of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in decubitus position with prone position. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 14(9): 686-688, 2013

Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy. Surgical Endoscopy 32(4): 1945-1953, 2017

Comparison of perioperative and oncological outcome of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in left decubitus position and in prone position for esophageal cancer. Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery 403(5): 607-614, 2018

Thoracoscopic oesophageal mobilization during thoracolaparoscopy three-stage oesophagectomy: a comparison of lateral decubitus versus semiprone positions. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery 17(5): 829-834, 2014

Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone versus decubitus position: ergonomic evaluation from a randomized and controlled study. Annals of Thoracic Surgery 98(3): 1072-1078, 2014