+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Comparisons of hearing threshold changes in male workers with unilateral conductive hearing loss exposed to workplace noise: a retrospective cohort study for 8 years

Comparisons of hearing threshold changes in male workers with unilateral conductive hearing loss exposed to workplace noise: a retrospective cohort study for 8 years

Annals of Occupational and Environmental Medicine 28: 51

The purpose of this study was to investigate hearing threshold changes of workers with unilateral conductive hearing loss who were exposed to workplace noise for 8-years. Among 1819 workers at a shipyard in Ulsan, 78 subjects with an air-bone gap ≥10 dBHL in unilateral ears were selected. Factors that could affect hearing were acquired from questionnaires, physical examinations, and biochemistry examinations. Paired t-test was conducted to compare the hearing threshold changes over time between conductive hearing loss (CHL) ear and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) ear. The study included male subjects aged 48.7 ± 2.9, having worked for 29.8 ± 2.7 years. Hearing thresholds increased significantly in CHL ears and SNHL ears at all frequencies (0.5-6 kHz) during follow-up period (p < 0.05). The threshold change at 4 kHz was 3.2 dBHL higher in SNHL ears which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). When workers were exposed to noise levels of 85 dBA and above, threshold change at 4 kHz was 5.6 dBHL higher in SNHL ears which was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Among workers aged below 50, the threshold change values were lower in low-frequency (0.5-2 kHz) in SNHL ears, with a small range of changes, whereas in high-frequency (3-6 kHz), the range of changes was greater SNHL ears (p < 0.05). Among workers aged 50 and above, SNHL ears showed a wider range of changes in both high- and low-frequency areas (p < 0.05). At high-frequencies, particularly at 4 kHz, the range of hearing threshold changes was lower in ears with conductive hearing loss than in contralateral ears. This is suggested as a protective effect against noise exposure.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057473994

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27688888

DOI: 10.1186/s40557-016-0132-1

Related references

Noise-exposed male sheet-metal workers using hearing protectors. A longitudinal study of hearing threshold shifts covering fifteen years. Scandinavian Audiology 23(2): 123-128, 1994

Noise-induced hearing loss in shipyard workers with unilateral conductive hearing loss. Scandinavian Audiology 12(2): 135-140, 1983

The protective effect of a conductive hearing loss in workers exposed to industrial noise. Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences 16(3): 274-277, 1991

When is a conductive hearing loss not a conductive hearing loss? Causes of a mismatch in air-bone threshold measurements or a "pseudoconductive" hearing loss. Journal of Otolaryngology 33(2): 135-138, 2004

The noise exposed factory workers: the prevalence of sensori-neural hearing loss and their use of personal hearing protection devices. Medical Journal of Malaysia 48(3): 280-285, 1993

Hearing Benefit and Rated Satisfaction in Children with Unilateral Conductive Hearing Loss Using a Transcutaneous Magnetic-Coupled Bone-Conduction Hearing Aid. Journal of the American Academy of Audiology 27(10): 790-804, 2018

Prevention of the Evolution of Workers' Hearing Loss from Noise-Induced Hearing Loss in Noisy Environments through a Hearing Conservation Program. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology 20(1): 43-47, 2016

Comparison of speech discrimination in noise and directional hearing with 2 different sound processors of a bone-anchored hearing system in adults with unilateral severe or profound sensorineural hearing loss. Otology and Neurotology 34(6): 1064-1070, 2013

Hearing threshold measurements of workers exposed to impulse noise. Scandinavian Audiology. Supplementum 1980(Suppl 12): 273-281, 1980

A bone conduction hearing aid for a unilateral conductive hearing loss. A case report. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 78(1): 187-190, 1969

Hearing in noise test in subjects with conductive hearing loss. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 108(12): 937-942, 2009

Hearing threshold of workers not exposed to occupational noise: reference values. La Medicina del Lavoro 78(6): 427-440, 1987

Longitudinal changes in hearing threshold levels of noise-exposed construction workers. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 88(1): 45-60, 2015

Bone-anchored hearing devices in children with unilateral conductive hearing loss: a patient-carer perspective. Annals of Otology Rhinology and Laryngology 122(9): 582-587, 2013

Individual susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss: Choosing an optimal method of retrospective classification of workers into noise-susceptible and noise-resistant groups. International Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health 19(4): 235-245, 2006