+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Default settings of computerized physician order entry system order sets drive ordering habits



Default settings of computerized physician order entry system order sets drive ordering habits



Journal of Pathology Informatics 6: 16



Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) systems are quickly becoming ubiquitous, and groups of orders ("order sets") to allow for easy order input are a common feature. This provides a streamlined mechanism to view, modify, and place groups of related orders. This often serves as an electronic equivalent of a specialty requisition. A characteristic, of these order sets is that specific orders can be predetermined to be "preselected" or "defaulted-on" whenever the order set is used while others are "optional" or "defaulted-off" (though there is typically the option is to "deselect" defaulted-on tests in a given situation). While it seems intuitive that the defaults in an order set are often accepted, additional study is required to understand the impact of these "default" settings in an order set on ordering habits. This study set out to quantify the effect of changing the default settings of an order set. For quality improvement purposes, order sets dealing with transfusions were recently reviewed and modified to improve monitoring of outcome. Initially, the order for posttransfusion hematocrits and platelet count had the default setting changed from "optional" to "preselected." The default settings for platelet count was later changed back to "optional," allowing for a natural experiment to study the effect of the default selections of an order set on clinician ordering habits. Posttransfusion hematocrit values were ordered for 8.3% of red cell transfusions when the default order set selection was "off" and for 57.4% of transfusions when the default selection was "preselected" (P < 0.0001). Posttransfusion platelet counts were ordered for 7.0% of platelet transfusions when the initial default order set selection was "optional," increased to 59.4% when the default was changed to "preselected" (P < 0.0001), and then decreased to 7.5% when the default selection was returned to "optional." The posttransfusion platelet count rates during the two "optional" periods: 7.0% versus 7.5% - were not statistically different (P = 0.620). Default settings in CPOE order sets can significantly influence physician selection of laboratory tests. Careful consideration by all stakeholders, including clinicians and pathologists, should be obtained when establishing default settings in order sets.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057566464

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25838968

DOI: 10.4103/2153-3539.153916


Related references

Improving the utilization of admission order sets in a computerized physician order entry system by integrating modular disease specific order subsets into a general medicine admission order set. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 18(3): 322-326, 2011

The characteristics of personal order sets in a computerized physician order entry system at a community hospital. AMIA ... Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium 2004: 1031, 2004

Automated development of order sets and corollary orders by data mining in an ambulatory computerized physician order entry system. AMIA ... Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium 2007: 819-823, 2007

Physician order entry or nurse order entry? Comparison of two implementation strategies for a computerized order entry system aimed at reducing dosing medication errors. Journal of Medical Internet Research 12(1): E5, 2010

Preparation and use of preconstructed orders, order sets, and order menus in a computerized provider order entry system. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10(4): 322-329, 2003

Order sets in computerized physician order entry systems: an analysis of seven sites. AMIA ... Annual Symposium Proceedings. AMIA Symposium 2010: 892-896, 2016

The Complexities of Studying Computerized Physician Order Entry: Implications for the Perceived Effectiveness of Stroke Order Sets. Annals of Emergency Medicine 67(4): 560-561, 2016

Using intranet-based order sets to standardize clinical care and prepare for computerized physician order entry. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Safety 30(7): 366-376, 2004

Systematic update of computerized physician order entry order sets to improve quality of care: a case study. Pediatrics 131(Suppl. 1): S60-S67, 2013

A computerized physician order entry system for the promotion of ordering compliance and appropriate test utilization. Journal of Healthcare Information Management 13(3): 63-72, 2000

Computerized Provider Order Entry - Ordering of Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy in a Computerized Provider Order Entry System. Hospital Pharmacy 42(3): 255-257, 2007

Trends in RBC ordering and use after implementing adaptive alerts in the electronic computerized physician order entry system. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 141(4): 534-541, 2014

Usability evaluation of a computerized physician order entry for medication ordering. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 150: 532-536, 2009

Impact of the automatic rounding-off function of the computerized physician order entry system on the ordering time and dose dispersion of chemotherapeutic drugs in regimens for hematologic malignancies. International Journal of Medical Informatics 85(1): 76-79, 2016

Computerized physician order entry and decision support improves ED analgesic ordering for renal colic. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 32(9): 958-961, 2014