+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Design, implementation and reporting strategies to reduce the instance and impact of missing patient-reported outcome (PRO) data: a systematic review

Design, implementation and reporting strategies to reduce the instance and impact of missing patient-reported outcome (PRO) data: a systematic review

BMJ Open 6(6): E010938

Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide important information about the impact of treatment from the patients' perspective. However, missing PRO data may compromise the interpretability and value of the findings. We aimed to report: (1) a non-technical summary of problems caused by missing PRO data; and (2) a systematic review by collating strategies to: (A) minimise rates of missing PRO data, and (B) facilitate transparent interpretation and reporting of missing PRO data in clinical research. Our systematic review does not address statistical handling of missing PRO data. MEDLINE and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) databases (inception to 31 March 2015), and citing articles and reference lists from relevant sources. English articles providing recommendations for reducing missing PRO data rates, or strategies to facilitate transparent interpretation and reporting of missing PRO data were included. 2 reviewers independently screened articles against eligibility criteria. Discrepancies were resolved with the research team. Recommendations were extracted and coded according to framework synthesis. 117 sources (55% discussion papers, 26% original research) met the eligibility criteria. Design and methodological strategies for reducing rates of missing PRO data included: incorporating PRO-specific information into the protocol; carefully designing PRO assessment schedules and defining termination rules; minimising patient burden; appointing a PRO coordinator; PRO-specific training for staff; ensuring PRO studies are adequately resourced; and continuous quality assurance. Strategies for transparent interpretation and reporting of missing PRO data include utilising auxiliary data to inform analysis; transparently reporting baseline PRO scores, rates and reasons for missing data; and methods for handling missing PRO data. The instance of missing PRO data and its potential to bias clinical research can be minimised by implementing thoughtful design, rigorous methodology and transparent reporting strategies. All members of the research team have a responsibility in implementing such strategies.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057582540

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27311907

DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010938

Related references

A systematic review and development of a classification framework for factors associated with missing patient-reported outcome data. Clinical Trials 15(1): 95-106, 2017

What is the optimal time point to assess patient-reported recovery after hip and knee replacement? A systematic review and analysis of routinely reported outcome data from the English patient-reported outcome measures programme. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 11: 128, 2013

Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Research Synthesis Methods 6(2): 175-187, 2016

The level of patient-reported outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of brain tumour patients: a systematic review. European Journal of Cancer 50(14): 2432-2448, 2015

Patient-reported outcome use in oncology: a systematic review of the impact on patient-clinician communication. Supportive Care in Cancer 26(1): 41-60, 2017

A systematic review of the quality of reporting of simulation studies about methods for the analysis of complex longitudinal patient-reported outcomes data. Quality of Life Research 27(10): 2507-2516, 2018

The impact of patient-reported outcome measures in clinical practice for pain: a systematic review. Quality of Life Research 26(2): 245-257, 2016

Patient-reported outcomes in head and neck and thyroid cancer randomised controlled trials: A systematic review of completeness of reporting and impact on interpretation. European Journal of Cancer 56: 144-161, 2016

Patient-reported outcome measures of the impact of cancer on patients' everyday lives: a systematic review. Journal of Cancer Survivorship 11(2): 211-232, 2016

Assessing the impact of headaches and the outcomes of treatment: A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Cephalalgia 38(7): 1374-1386, 2017

A systematic survey shows that reporting and handling of missing outcome data in networks of interventions is poor. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 18(1): 115, 2018

Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System and Legacy Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in the Field of Orthopaedics: A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy 34(2): 605-614, 2017

Missing data: a systematic review of how they are reported and handled. Epidemiology 23(5): 729-732, 2012

Demonstrating Methods for Handling Missing Patient Reported Outcome (Pro) Data in Clinical Trial Data Analysis. Value in Health 18(7): A711, 2015

A systematic review of the impact of routine collection of patient reported outcome measures on patients, providers and health organisations in an oncologic setting. Bmc Health Services Research 13: 211, 2013