+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Effectiveness of Minocycline/Rifampin vs Chlorhexidine/Silver Sulfadiazine-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters



Effectiveness of Minocycline/Rifampin vs Chlorhexidine/Silver Sulfadiazine-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters



Journal of the American College of Surgeons 221(4): 891-892




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057714678

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26364070

DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.07.004


Related references

Effectiveness of Minocycline and Rifampin vs Chlorhexidine and Silver Sulfadiazine-Impregnated Central Venous Catheters in Preventing Central Line-Associated Bloodstream Infection in a High-Volume Academic Intensive Care Unit: A Before and after Trial. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 221(3): 739-747, 2015

The effectiveness of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters in patients receiving high-dose chemotherapy followed by peripheral stem cell transplantation. European Journal of Cancer Care 18(5): 477-482, 2009

Inhibitory effect of explanted chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters on Staphylococcus epidermidis. Abstracts of the Interscience Conference on Antimicrobial Agents & Chemotherapy 40: 422, 2000

Impact of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters on in vitro quantitation of catheter-associated bacteria. Journal of Clinical Microbiology 34(10): 2640-2641, 1996

Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters: in vitro antibacterial activity and impact on bacterial adhesion. New Microbiologica 35(2): 175-182, 2012

Analysis of a reduction in bloodstream infections as related to use of untreated vs silver/chlorhexidine vs rifampin/minocycline central venous catheters. Abstracts of the General Meeting of the American Society for Microbiology 101: 469, 2001

Evaluation of chlorhexidine and silver-sulfadiazine impregnated central venous catheters for the prevention of bloodstream infection in leukaemic patients: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Hospital Infection 37(2): 145-156, 1997

Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters save costs. American Journal of Infection Control 42(3): 321-324, 2014

Efficiency of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters at subclavian sites. American Journal of Infection Control 43(7): 711-714, 2015

Effect of chlorhexidine/silver sulfadiazine-impregnated central venous catheters in an intensive care unit with a low blood stream infection rate after implementation of an educational program: a before-after trial. Surgical Infections 8(4): 445-454, 2007

Double-lumen central venous catheters impregnated with chlorhexidine and silver sulfadiazine to prevent catheter colonisation in the intensive care unit setting: a prospective randomised study. Journal of Hospital Infection 72(3): 227-233, 2009

A meta-analysis dealing with the effectiveness of chlorhexidine and silver-sufhadiazine impregnated central venous catheters. Journal of Hospital Infection 40(2): 166-168, 1998

Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters are efficient even at subclavian sites without tracheostomy. American Journal of Infection Control 44(12): 1526-1529, 2016

Cost/benefit analysis of chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine-impregnated venous catheters for femoral access. American Journal of Infection Control 42(10): 1130-1132, 2014

Chlorhexidine-silver sulfadiazine- or rifampicin-miconazole-impregnated venous catheters decrease the risk of catheter-related bloodstream infection similarly. American Journal of Infection Control 44(1): 50-53, 2016