+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Effects of long axis in-plane vs short axis out-of-plane techniques during ultrasound-guided vascular access

Effects of long axis in-plane vs short axis out-of-plane techniques during ultrasound-guided vascular access

American Journal of Emergency Medicine 34(5): 778-783

Currently, whether long-axis in-plane (LA-IP) is superior to short-axis out-of-plane (SA-OOP) during ultrasound-guided vascular access remains inconclusive. We, therefore, conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to compare the effects of LA-IP vs SA-OOP techniques in patients undergoing ultrasound-guided vascular access (USGVA). A computer-based literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library (up to October 2015) was performed to identify randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of LA-IP compared with SA-OOP in patients undergoing USGVA. The primary end point was the first-pass success rate. Secondary end points included mean time to success, mean attempts to success, and incidence of the complication of hematoma. Weighted mean differences (WMDs) and relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated by random-effects model. Five eligible studies with a total of 470 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference for the first-pass success rate (RR, 1.06; 95% CI, 0.91-1.23; P = .44), mean time to success (WMD, 4.78seconds; 95% CI, -4.43 to 13.99; P = .31), mean attempts to success (WMD, 0.06 times; 95% CI, -0.23 to 0.35; P = .69), and incidence of the complication of hematoma (RR, 2.86; 95% CI, 0.32-25.42; P = .35) between the LA-IP and SA-OOP groups. There is insufficient evidence to definitively choose either LA-IP or SA-OOP in patients undergoing USGVA. Further robustly well-designed trials are warranted to investigate the appropriate technique in patients receiving USGVA.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057730314

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26830218

DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.12.092

Related references

Comparison between the long-axis/in-plane and short-axis/out-of-plane approaches for ultrasound-guided vascular catheterization: an updated meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis. Therapeutics and Clinical Risk Management 14: 331-340, 2018

Ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation: long axis/in-plane versus short axis/out-of-plane approaches?. Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing 27(3): 319-324, 2013

Short-axis/out-of-plane or long-axis/in-plane ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation in children: A randomised controlled trial. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 33(7): 522-527, 2016

Comparison of short-axis out-of-plane versus long-axis in-plane ultrasound-guided radial arterial cannulation in adult patients: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Anesthesia 31(1): 89-94, 2017

Comparing Combined Short-Axis and Long-Axis Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheterization With Conventional Short-Axis Out-of-Plane Approaches. Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia 33(4): 1029-1034, 2019

Modified short-axis out-of-plane ultrasound versus conventional long-axis in-plane ultrasound to guide radial artery cannulation: a randomized controlled trial. Anesthesia and Analgesia 119(1): 163-169, 2014

Ultrasound guided internal jugular vein cannulation in infants: Comparative evaluation of novel modified short axis out of plane approach with conventional short axis out of plane approach. Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 62(3): 208-213, 2018

A randomized comparison of long-axis and short-axis imaging for in-plane ultrasound-guided popliteal-sciatic perineural catheter insertion. Journal of Anesthesia 28(6): 854-860, 2014

Ultrasound-guided internal jugular vein access: comparison between short axis and long axis techniques. Saudi Journal of Kidney Diseases and Transplantation 24(4): 707-713, 2013

Needle tip visualization during ultrasound-guided vascular access: short-axis vs long-axis approach. American Journal of Emergency Medicine 28(3): 343-347, 2010

Short-axis versus long-axis approaches for teaching ultrasound-guided vascular access on a new inanimate model. Academic Emergency Medicine 10(12): 1307-1311, 2003

A randomized comparison of long-and short-axis imaging for in-plane ultrasound-guided femoral perineural catheter insertion. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 32(1): 149-156, 2013

Cardiac through-plane motion Comparison of long-axis length and shortening in long-axis and short-axis magnetic resonance images. European Heart Journal 15(ABSTR Suppl. ): 574, 1994

Evaluating the Long-, Short-, and Oblique-Axis Approaches for Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Access Cannulation. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine 38(2): 347-355, 2019

Dynamic ultrasound-guided, short axis, out-of-plane radial artery cannulation: the 'follow the tip' technique. Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 41(3): 431-432, 2013