+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Effects of low glycaemic index/low glycaemic load vs. high glycaemic index/ high glycaemic load diets on overweight/obesity and associated risk factors in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis



Effects of low glycaemic index/low glycaemic load vs. high glycaemic index/ high glycaemic load diets on overweight/obesity and associated risk factors in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis



Nutrition Journal 14: 87



The objective of the present systematic review and meta-analysis was to synthesize the available literature data investigating the effects of low glycaemic index/low glycamic load dietary regimens on anthropometric parameters, blood lipid profiles, and indicators of glucose metabolism in children and adolescents. Literature search was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of trials with restrictions to randomized controlled trials, but no limitations concerning language and publication date. Parameters taken into account were: body weight, body mass index, z-score of body mass index, fat mass, fat-free mass, height, waist cicrumference, hip circumference, waist-to-hip ratio, total cholesterol, LDL-cholesterol, HDL-cholesterol, triglycerides, diastolic and systolic blood pressure, fasting serum glucose, fasting serum insulin, HOMA-index, glycosylated haemoglobin, and C-reactive protein. Meta-analyses were performed for each parameter to assess pooled effect in terms of weighted mean differences between the post-intervention (or differences in means) of the low glycaemic index diets and the respective high glycaemic index counterparts. Data analysis was performed using the Review Manager 5.3. software. Nine studies enrolling 1.065 children or adolescents met the inclusion criteria. Compared to diets providing a high gylcaemic index, low glycaemic index protocols resulted in significantly more pronounced decreases in serum triglycerides [mean differences -15.14 mg/dl, 95%-CI (-26.26, -4.00)] and HOMA-index [mean difference -0.70, 95%-CI (-1.37, -0.04), fixed-effects model only]. Other parameters under investigation were not affected by either low or high glycaemic indices. The present systematic review and meta-analysis provides evidence of a beneficial effect of a low glycaemic index/load diet in children and adolescents being either overweight or obese. Regarding the limitations of this analysis, further studies adopting a homogenous design are necessary to assure the present findings. Since low glycaemic index/load regimens were not associated with a deterioration of the outcome parameters, these diets should not be categorically excluded when looking for alternatives to change lifestyle habits in this age group.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057730440

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26489667

DOI: 10.1186/s12937-015-0077-1


Related references

Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and breast cancer risk a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal Of Cancer: 7, 1170-1175, 2008

Dietary glycaemic index, glycaemic load and endometrial and ovarian cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. British Journal of Cancer 99(3): 434-441, 2008

Low glycaemic index or low glycaemic load diets for overweight and obesity. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2007(3): Cd005105, 2007

Glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to risk of diabetes-related cancers: a meta-analysis. British Journal of Nutrition 108(11): 1934-1947, 2012

Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to the risk of type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. British Journal of Nutrition 106(11): 1649-1654, 2011

Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load among Australian children and adolescents. British Journal of Nutrition 106(8): 1273-1282, 2011

The Decreasing Trend in Dietary Glycaemic Index and Glycaemic Load in Australian Children and Adolescents between 1995 and 2012. Nutrients 10(9):, 2018

Glycaemic index, insulinemic index and glycaemic load of soya drinks with low and high levels of carbohydrates. 2006

High-glycaemic index and -glycaemic load meals increase the availability of tryptophan in healthy volunteers. British Journal of Nutrition 105(11): 1601-1606, 2011

Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in relation to food and nutrient intake and indices of body fatness in British children and adolescents. British Journal of Nutrition 110(8): 1512-1523, 2013

Dietary glycaemic index and glycaemic load in a rural elderly population (60-74 years of age) and their relationship with cardiovascular risk factors. European Journal of Nutrition 54(4): 523-534, 2016

Low glycaemic index, or low glycaemic load, diets for diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2009(1): Cd006296, 2009

Overall glycaemic index and glycaemic load of habitual diet and risk of heart disease. Public Health Nutrition 14(1): 109-118, 2011

Glycaemic index, glycaemic load and risk of endometrial cancer: a prospective cohort study. Public Health Nutrition 8(7): 912-919, 2005

Glycaemic index, glycaemic load and ovarian cancer risk: a prospective cohort study. Public Health Nutrition 10(10): 1076-1081, 2007