+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Estimating interevent time distributions from finite observation periods in communication networks



Estimating interevent time distributions from finite observation periods in communication networks



Physical Review. E Statistical Nonlinear and Soft Matter Physics 92(5): 052813



A diverse variety of processes-including recurrent disease episodes, neuron firing, and communication patterns among humans-can be described using interevent time (IET) distributions. Many such processes are ongoing, although event sequences are only available during a finite observation window. Because the observation time window is more likely to begin or end during long IETs than during short ones, the analysis of such data is susceptible to a bias induced by the finite observation period. In this paper, we illustrate how this length bias is born and how it can be corrected without assuming any particular shape for the IET distribution. To do this, we model event sequences using stationary renewal processes, and we formulate simple heuristics for determining the severity of the bias. To illustrate our results, we focus on the example of empirical communication networks, which are temporal networks that are constructed from communication events. The IET distributions of such systems guide efforts to build models of human behavior, and the variance of IETs is very important for estimating the spreading rate of information in networks of temporal interactions. We analyze several well-known data sets from the literature, and we find that the resulting bias can lead to systematic underestimates of the variance in the IET distributions and that correcting for the bias can lead to qualitatively different results for the tails of the IET distributions.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057798172

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26651750

DOI: 10.1103/physreve.92.052813


Related references

Limited life-table factors for estimating radiation-induced cancers over finite time periods. Health Physics 47(1): 47-57, 1984

Estimating background activity based on interevent-time distribution. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96(1): 313-320, 2006

Physics of the Omori law; inferences from interevent time distributions and pore pressure diffusion modeling. Tectonophysics 424(3-4): 209-222, 2006

Earthquake interevent time distributions reflect the proportion of dependent and independent events pairs and are therefore not universal. Geophysical Research Abstracts 12, 2010

Update rules and interevent time distributions: slow ordering versus no ordering in the voter model. Physical Review. E Statistical Nonlinear and Soft Matter Physics 84(1 Pt 2): 015103, 2011

Finite-difference-time-domain analysis of finite-number-of-periods holographic and surface-relief gratings. Applied Optics 47(12): 1981-1994, 2008

Estimating functions of probability distributions from a finite set of samples. Physical Review. E Statistical Physics Plasmas Fluids and Related Interdisciplinary Topics 52(6): 6841-6854, 1995

Longitudinal Study of Tacrolimus in Lymphocytes During the First Year After Kidney Transplantation. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 40(5): 558-566, 2018

Factorized time-dependent distributions for certain multiclass queueing networks and an application to enzymatic processing networks. Queueing Systems 69(3-4): 313-328, 2011

The influence of finite observation periods on familial and chronic disease epidemiology. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 58(1): 9-11, 1977

Quantifying uncertainty in mean earthquake interevent times for a finite sample. Journal of Geophysical Research 114.B1, 2009

Efficiency of detection of estrus in dairy cattle with varying length of observation periods and fixed total time of observation per day. Journal of Dairy Science 75(Suppl. 1): 242, 1992

Communication dynamics in finite capacity social networks. Physical Review Letters 109(16): 168701, 2012

Downlink power distributions for 2G and 3G mobile communication networks. Radiation Protection Dosimetry 157(4): 477-487, 2013

Recovering the parameters of finite mixtures of normal distributions from a noisy record: an empirical comparison of different estimating procedures. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 8(4): 309-334, 1983