+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Exercise physiology in chronic mechanical circulatory support patients: vascular function and beyond



Exercise physiology in chronic mechanical circulatory support patients: vascular function and beyond



Current Opinion in Cardiology 31(3): 292-298



The majority of patients currently implanted with left ventricular assist devices have the expectation of support for more than 2 years. As a result, survival alone is no longer a sufficient distinctive for this technology, and there have been many studies within the last few years examining functional capacity and exercise outcomes. Despite strong evidence for functional class improvements and increases in simple measures of walking distance, there remains incomplete normalization of exercise capacity, even in the presence of markedly improved resting hemodynamics. Reasons for this remain unclear. Despite current pumps being run at a fixed speed, it is widely recognized that pump outputs significantly increase with exercise. The mechanism of this increase involves the interaction between preload, afterload, and the intrinsic pump function curves. The role of the residual heart function is also important in determining total cardiac output, as well as whether the aortic valve opens with exercise. Interactions with the vasculature, with skeletal muscle blood flow and the state of the autonomic nervous system are also likely to be important contributors to exercise performance. Further studies examining optimization of pump function with active pump speed modulation and options for optimization of the overall patient condition are likely to be needed to allow left ventricular assist devices to be used with the hope of full functional physiological recovery.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057830178

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26945227

DOI: 10.1097/HCO.0000000000000285


Related references

The differences in hemodyanamics, cardiac function and myocardial structure associated with chronic mechanical circulatory in patients support with either pulsatile or continuous flow left ventricular assist devices. Journal of Heart & Lung Transplantation 22(1S): S219, January, 2003

Increased need for right ventricular support in patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy undergoing mechanical circulatory support: outcomes from the INTERMACS Registry (Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support). Journal of the American College of Cardiology 63(3): 240-248, 2014

Outcomes of patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy who received mechanical circulatory support. Data from the Interagency Registry for Mechanically Assisted Circulatory Support. Circulation. Heart Failure 7(2): 300-309, 2014

Mechanical support as failure intervention in patients with cavopulmonary shunts (MFICS): rationale and aims of a new registry of mechanical circulatory support in single ventricle patients. Congenital Heart Disease 8(3): 182-186, 2014

Letter by Dalzell regarding article, "outcomes of patients with peripartum cardiomyopathy who received mechanical circulatory support: data from the interagency registry for mechanically assisted circulatory support". Circulation. Heart Failure 7(4): 695-695, 2014

Comparison of Lurasidone and Quetiapine in Critically Ill Patients. Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2018: 885066618788009, 2018

Circulating microparticles as a predictor of vascular properties in patients on mechanical circulatory support; hype or hope?. Physiological Research 65(5): 727-735, 2016

The effect of chronic mechanical circulatory support on neuroendocrine activation in patients with end-stage heart failure. European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery 16(1): 63-67, 1999

Liver and kidney function in patients undergoing mechanical circulatory support with Jarvik-7 artificial heart as a bridge to transplantation. Journal of Heart Transplantation 9(6): 631-637, 1990

Prediction of true circulatory decompensation in chronic heart failure for optimal timing of mechanical circulatory support: non-invasive arterial-ventricular coupling. Journal of Functional Biomaterials 3(1): 100-113, 2012

A viable therapeutic option: mechanical circulatory support of the failing Fontan physiology. Pediatric Cardiology 34(6): 1357-1365, 2014

Chronic mechanical circulatory support for inotrope-dependent heart failure patients who are not transplant candidates: results of the INTrEPID Trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology 50(8): 741-747, 2007

Effect of exercise training on functional aerobic capacity, cardiac function and peripheral circulatory function in chronic hemodialysis patients. Nihon Jinzo Gakkai Shi 27(10): 1429-1436, 1985

An exploratory study of sleep quality, daytime function, and quality of life in patients with mechanical circulatory support. International Journal of Artificial Organs 35(7): 531-537, 2013

Biventricular support is superior to univentricular support for mechanical circulatory assistance in patients after cardiotomy. Journal of Heart Transplantation 6(5): 313-314, 1987