+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Exposures to conducted electrical weapons (including TASER® devices): how many and for how long are acceptable?

Exposures to conducted electrical weapons (including TASER® devices): how many and for how long are acceptable?

Journal of Forensic Sciences 60(Suppl. 1): S116-S129

TASER(®) conducted electrical weapons (CEWs) are an important law-enforcement tool. The purposes of this study are a) to review recent literature regarding potential pathophysiological responses to applications of CEWs, and other related issues and b) to evaluate whether enough data exist to determine the acceptability of longer-duration (or repeated) exposures. This is a narrative review, using a multidisciplinary approach of analyzing reports from physiological, legal-medical, and police-strategy literature sources. In general, short-duration exposures to CEWs result in limited effects. Longer-duration or repeated exposures may be utilized with caution, although there are currently not enough data to determine the acceptability of all types of exposures. Data examined in the literature have inherent limitations. Appropriateness of specific types of CEW usage may be determined by individual police agencies, applying risk/benefit analyses unique to each organization. While more research is recommended, initial concepts of potential future long-duration or repeated CEW applications are presented.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057841435

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25443856

DOI: 10.1111/1556-4029.12672

Related references

Increased hematocrit after applications of conducted energy weapons (including TASER(®) devices) to Sus scrofa. Journal of Forensic Sciences 56(Suppl. 1): S229-S233, 2011

An animal model to investigate effectiveness and safety of conducted energy weapons (including TASER devices). Journal of Forensic Sciences 55(2): 521-526, 2010

Blood lactate concentration after exposure to conducted energy weapons (including TASER® devices): is it clinically relevant?. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology 9(3): 386-394, 2014

TASER conducted electrical weapons and implanted pacemakers and defibrillators. Conference Proceedings 2009: 3199-3204, 2010

Cardiac fibrillation risks with TASER conducted electrical weapons. Conference Proceedings 2015: 323-329, 2016

TASER® conducted electrical weapons: misconceptions in the scientific/medical and other literature. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology 11(1): 53-64, 2015

Cardiac effects of varying pulse charge and polarity of TASER conducted electrical weapons. Conference Proceedings 2009: 3195-3198, 2010

Presenting rhythm in sudden deaths temporally proximate to discharge of TASER conducted electrical weapons. Academic Emergency Medicine 16(8): 726-739, 2009

Exposures of Sus scrofa to a TASER(®) conducted electrical weapon: no effects on 2-dimensional gel electrophoresis patterns of plasma proteins. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology 10(4): 526-534, 2015

Taser and Conducted Energy Weapons. Journal of Special Operations Medicine 15(4): 83-88, 2016

Do TASER Electrical Weapons Actually Electrocute?. Canadian Journal of Cardiology 32(10): 1261.E11, 2016

Deaths in custody: are some due to electronic control devices (including TASER devices) or excited delirium?. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 17(1): 1-7, 2010

Immediate cardiovascular effects of the Taser X26 conducted electrical weapon. Emergency Medicine Journal 26(8): 567-570, 2009

Electrical safety of conducted electrical weapons relative to requirements of relevant electrical standards. Conference Proceedings 2013: 5342-5347, 2015

Conducted electrical weapon (TASER) use against minors: a shocking analysis. Pediatric Emergency Care 28(9): 873-877, 2013