+ Site Statistics
References:
52,654,530
Abstracts:
29,560,856
PMIDs:
28,072,755
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Eye-movement strategies in developmental prosopagnosia and "super" face recognition



Eye-movement strategies in developmental prosopagnosia and "super" face recognition



Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 70(2): 201-217



Developmental prosopagnosia (DP) is a cognitive condition characterized by a severe deficit in face recognition. Few investigations have examined whether impairments at the early stages of processing may underpin the condition, and it is also unknown whether DP is simply the "bottom end" of the typical face-processing spectrum. To address these issues, we monitored the eye-movements of DPs, typical perceivers, and "super recognizers" (SRs) while they viewed a set of static images displaying people engaged in naturalistic social scenarios. Three key findings emerged: (a) Individuals with more severe prosopagnosia spent less time examining the internal facial region, (b) as observed in acquired prosopagnosia, some DPs spent less time examining the eyes and more time examining the mouth than controls, and (c) SRs spent more time examining the nose-a measure that also correlated with face recognition ability in controls. These findings support previous suggestions that DP is a heterogeneous condition, but suggest that at least the most severe cases represent a group of individuals that qualitatively differ from the typical population. While SRs seem to merely be those at the "top end" of normal, this work identifies the nose as a critical region for successful face recognition.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057851537

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26933872

DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2016.1161059


Related references

Movement cues aid face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia. Neuropsychology 29(6): 855-860, 2016

Face ethnicity and measurement reliability affect face recognition performance in developmental prosopagnosia: evidence from the Cambridge Face Memory Test-Australian. Cognitive Neuropsychology 28(2): 109-146, 2012

The activation of visual face memory and explicit face recognition are delayed in developmental prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia 75: 538-547, 2016

Face recognition impairments despite normal holistic processing and face space coding: evidence from a case of developmental prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 27(8): 636-664, 2012

Recognition memory in developmental prosopagnosia: electrophysiological evidence for abnormal routes to face recognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 622, 2014

Dissociations of face and object recognition in developmental prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 17(2): 249-261, 2005

Mapping self-face recognition strategies in congenital prosopagnosia. Neuropsychology 32(2): 123-137, 2018

Electrophysiological markers of covert face recognition in developmental prosopagnosia. Brain 135(Pt 2): 542-554, 2012

Reading in developmental prosopagnosia: Evidence for a dissociation between word and face recognition. Neuropsychology 32(2): 138-147, 2018

Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia. Neuroreport 10(4): 823-827, 1999

Developmental prosopagnosia and super-recognition: no special role for surface reflectance processing. Neuropsychologia 50(2): 334-340, 2012

The neural network for face recognition: Insights from an fMRI study on developmental prosopagnosia. Neuroimage 169: 151-161, 2017

On the Relation between Face and Object Recognition in Developmental Prosopagnosia: No Dissociation but a Systematic Association. Plos One 11(10): E0165561, 2016

Developmental prosopagnosia in children A case study of improvement in face recognition as a result of training. 2012

Face gender recognition in developmental prosopagnosia Evidence for holistic processing and use of configural information. Visual Cognition 20(10): 1242-1253, 2012