+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Frailty prevalence and associated factors in the Mexican health and aging study: A comparison of the frailty index and the phenotype



Frailty prevalence and associated factors in the Mexican health and aging study: A comparison of the frailty index and the phenotype



Experimental Gerontology 79: 55-60



Frailty is a relatively new phenomenon described mainly in the older population. There are a number of different tools that aim at categorizing an older adult as frail. Two of the main tools for this purpose are the Fried's frailty phenotype (FFP) and the frailty index (FI). The aim of this report is to determine the prevalence of frailty and associated factors using both FFP and the FI. Secondary analysis of 1108 individuals aged 60 or older is participating in the third (2012) wave from the Mexican Health and Aging Study (MHAS). The FFP and the FI were constructed and a set of variables from different domains were used to explore associations. Domains included were: socio-demographic, health-related, and psychological factors. Regarding prevalence, concordance was tested with a kappa statistic. To test significant associations when classifying with each of the tools, multiple logistic regression models were fitted. Mean (SD) age was 69.8 (7.6) years, and 54.6% (n=606) were women. The prevalence of frailty with FFP was 24.9% (n=276) while with FI 27.5% (n=305). Kappa statistics for concordance between tools was 0.34 (p<0.001). Age, years in school, number of past days in bed due to health problems, number of times that consulted a physician last year for health problems, having smoked in the past, and life satisfaction were associated with frailty when using any of the tools. There is a persistent heterogeneity on how frailty is measured that should be addressed in future research.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057898237

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27032304

DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.03.016


Related references

Frailty prevalence and factors associated with the Frailty Phenotype and Frailty Index: Findings from the North West Adelaide Health Study. Australasian Journal on Ageing 37(2): 120-126, 2017

Initial manifestations of frailty criteria and the development of frailty phenotype in the Women's Health and Aging Study II. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 63(9): 984-990, 2008

Diagnostic Test of a Scoring System for Frailty Syndrome in the Elderly According to Cardiovascular Health Study, Study of Osteoporotic Fracture and Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment Based Frailty Index Compared with Frailty Index 40 Items. Acta Medica Indonesiana 47(3): 183-187, 2016

Prevalence and outcomes of frailty in Korean elderly population: comparisons of a multidimensional frailty index with two phenotype models. Plos One 9(2): E87958, 2014

Components of the Frailty Phenotype in Relation to the Frailty Index: Results From the Toulouse Frailty Platform. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association 16(10): 855-859, 2016

A Frailty Index from Next-of-Kin Data: A Cross-Sectional Analysis from the Mexican Health and Aging Study. Biomed Research International 2017: 6069374, 2018

Comparison and Clinical Applications of the Frailty Phenotype and Frailty Index Approaches. Interdisciplinary Topics in Gerontology and Geriatrics 41: 74-84, 2016

Fried phenotype of frailty: cross-sectional comparison of three frailty stages on various health domains. Bmc Geriatrics 15: 77, 2016

The prevalence of frailty and related factors in community-dwelling Turkish elderly according to modified Fried Frailty Index and FRAIL scales. Aging Clinical and Experimental Research 27(5): 703-709, 2016

Frailty phenotype, frailty index and risk of mortality in Chinese elderly population- Rugao longevity and ageing study. Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics 80: 115-119, 2018

Identifying frailty: do the Frailty Index and Groningen Frailty Indicator cover different clinical perspectives? a cross-sectional study. Bmc Family Practice 14: 64, 2013

Frailty among Mexican community-dwelling elderly: a story told 11 years later. The Mexican Health and Aging Study. Salud Publica de Mexico 57 Suppl 1: S62-S69, 2017

Prevalence of Frailty and Factors Associated with Frailty in Individuals Aged 90 and Older: The 90+ Study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 64(11): 2257-2262, 2016

A clinical frailty index in aging mice: comparisons with frailty index data in humans. Journals of Gerontology. Series A, Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 69(6): 621-632, 2014

Correlates of frailty phenotype and frailty index and their associations with clinical outcomes. HIV Medicine 18(10): 764-771, 2017