+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Good Publication Practice for Communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: GPP3



Good Publication Practice for Communicating Company-Sponsored Medical Research: GPP3



Annals of Internal Medicine 163(6): 461-464



This updated Good Publication Practice (GPP) guideline, known as GPP3, builds on earlier versions and provides recommendations for individuals and organizations that contribute to the publication of research results sponsored or supported by pharmaceutical, medical device, diagnostics, and biotechnology companies. The recommendations are designed to help individuals and organizations maintain ethical and transparent publication practices and comply with legal and regulatory requirements. These recommendations cover publications in peer-reviewed journals and presentations (oral or poster) at scientific congresses. The International Society for Medical Publication Professionals invited more than 3000 professionals worldwide to apply for a position on the steering committee, or as a reviewer, for this guideline. The GPP2 authors reviewed all applications (n = 241) and assembled an 18-member steering committee that represented 7 countries and a diversity of publication professions and institutions. From the 174 selected reviewers, 94 sent comments on the second draft, which steering committee members incorporated after discussion and consensus. The resulting guideline includes new sections (Principles of Good Publication Practice for Company-Sponsored Medical Research, Data Sharing, Studies That Should Be Published, and Plagiarism), expands guidance on the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors' authorship criteria and common authorship issues, improves clarity on appropriate author payment and reimbursement, and expands information on the role of medical writers. By following good publication practices (including GPP3), individuals and organizations will show integrity; accountability; and responsibility for accurate, complete, and transparent reporting in their publications and presentations.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057950495

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26259067

DOI: 10.7326/m15-0288


Related references

Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. BMJ 339(Nov27 1): B4330-B4330, 2009

Implications of 2015 guidelines on good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research. Maturitas 88: 1-2, 2016

Research Methods & Reporting. Good publication practice for communicating company sponsored medical research: the GPP2 guidelines. Bmj 339: B4330, 2009

Can self-regulation deliver an ethical commercial literature? A critical reading of the "Good Publication Practice" (GPP3) guidelines for industry-financed medical journal articles. Accountability in Research 26(2): 85, 2019

Awareness and enforcement of guidelines for publishing industry-sponsored medical research among publication professionals: the Global Publication Survey. Bmj Open 4(4): E004780, 2014

Good publication practice in physiology 2017: Current Revisions of the Recommendations for the Conduct, Reporting, Editing and Publication of Scholarly Work in Medical Journals. Acta Physiologica 221(4): 283-284, 2017

Educating third-year medical students about pharmaceutical company interactions: Experiences from a 'SHAM' drug company sponsored event. 2008

Good research and publication practice in biomedical science. Indian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology 46(2): 131-135, 2002

Good publication practice guideline 3: Evolving standards for medical writers. Perspectives in Clinical Research 10(1): 4-8, 2019

The publication pattern of pharmaceutical company sponsored trials of antiasthmatic inhaled corticosteroid equivalency and efficacy. Journal of Allergy & Clinical Immunology 101(1 Part 2): S66, 1998

It is axiomatic for those engaged in medical practice to assume that publication is a priori, a good thing. Journal of Laryngology and Otology 116(7): 493, 2002

Good publication practice guidelines for medical communications agencies: a MedComm perspective. Current Medical Research and Opinion 25(2): 453-461, 2009

Does surge in research papers symbolize good publication practice? - a preliminary report from India. International Journal of Preventive Medicine 4(6): 738-739, 2013

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines on good publication practice. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 59(6): 403-404, 2000

Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). Guidelines on good publication practice. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 46(3): 217-221, 2001