+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches



Handling trial participants with missing outcome data when conducting a meta-analysis: a systematic survey of proposed approaches



Systematic Reviews 4: 98



When potentially associated with the likelihood of outcome, missing participant data represents a serious potential source of bias in randomized trials. Authors of systematic reviews frequently face this problem when conducting meta-analyses. The objective of this study is to conduct a systematic survey of the relevant literature to identify proposed approaches for how systematic review authors should handle missing participant data when conducting a meta-analysis. We searched MEDLINE and the Cochrane Methodology register from inception to August 2014. We included papers that devoted at least two paragraphs to discuss a relevant approach for missing data. Five pairs of reviewers, working independently and in duplicate, selected relevant papers. One reviewer abstracted data from included papers and a second reviewer verified them. We summarized the results narratively. Of 9,138 identified citations, we included 11 eligible papers. Four proposed general approaches for handling dichotomous outcomes, and all recommended a complete case analysis as the primary analysis and additional sensitivity analyses using the following imputation methods: based on reasons for missingness (n = 3), relative to risk among followed up (n = 3), best-case scenario (n = 2), and worst-case scenario (n = 3). Three of these approaches suggested taking uncertainty into account. Two papers proposed general approaches for handling continuous outcomes, and both proposed a complete case analysis as the reference analysis and the following imputation methods as sensitivity analyses: based on reasons for missingness (n = 2), based on the mean observed in the same trial or other trials (n = 1), and based on informative missingness differences in means (n = 1). The remaining eligible papers did not propose general approaches but addressed specific statistical issues. All proposed approaches for handling missing participant data recommend conducting a complete case analysis for the primary analysis and some form of sensitivity analysis to evaluate robustness of results. Although these approaches require further testing, they may guide review authors in addressing missing participant data.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 057966201

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26202162

DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0083-6


Related references

A systematic survey of the methods literature on the reporting quality and optimal methods of handling participants with missing outcome data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 88: 67-80, 2017

Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Research Synthesis Methods 6(2): 175-187, 2015

A systematic survey shows that reporting and handling of missing outcome data in networks of interventions is poor. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 18(1): 115, 2018

Demonstrating Methods for Handling Missing Patient Reported Outcome (Pro) Data in Clinical Trial Data Analysis. Value in Health 18(7): A711, 2015

184Handling missing participant data in meta-analysis of dichotomous outcomes: Proposed guidelines for systematic reviews of randomised trials. Occupational and Environmental Medicine 70(Suppl 1): A62.1-A62, 2013

Handling of Missing Outcome Data in Traumatic Brain Injury Research: A Systematic Review. Journal of Neurotrauma 36(19): 2743-2752, 2019

A Systematic Review of Methods for Handling Missing Variance Data in Meta-Analyses of Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Plos one 11(10): E0164827, 2016

Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey. Bmj Open 5(9): E009368, 2015

Reporting missing participant data in randomised trials: systematic survey of the methodological literature and a proposed guide. Bmj Open 5(12): E008431, 2015

A systematic survey on reporting and methods for handling missing participant data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 88: 57-66, 2017

Multiple imputation for handling systematically missing confounders in meta-analysis of individual participant data. Statistics in Medicine 32(28): 4890-4905, 2013

Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomized trials: a systematic review. Trials 17: 72, 2016

Missing outcome data in meta-analysis. Evidence-BasedMentalHealth21(3):123, 2018

Statistical analysis and handling of missing data in cluster randomised trials: protocol for a systematic review. Bmj Open 5(5): E007378, 2015

Addressing missing outcome data in meta-analysis. Evidence-Based Mental Health 17(3): 85-89, 2014