+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Hospitals In 'Magnet' Program Show Better Patient Outcomes On Mortality Measures Compared To Non-'Magnet' Hospitals



Hospitals In 'Magnet' Program Show Better Patient Outcomes On Mortality Measures Compared To Non-'Magnet' Hospitals



Health Affairs 34(6): 986-992



Hospital executives pursue external recognition to improve market share and demonstrate institutional commitment to quality of care. The Magnet Recognition Program of the American Nurses Credentialing Center identifies hospitals that epitomize nursing excellence, but it is not clear that receiving Magnet recognition improves patient outcomes. Using Medicare data on patients hospitalized for coronary artery bypass graft surgery, colectomy, or lower extremity bypass in 1998-2010, we compared rates of risk-adjusted thirty-day mortality and failure to rescue (death after a postoperative complication) between Magnet and non-Magnet hospitals matched on hospital characteristics. Surgical patients treated in Magnet hospitals, compared to those treated in non-Magnet hospitals, were 7.7 percent less likely to die within thirty days and 8.6 percent less likely to die after a postoperative complication. Across the thirteen-year study period, patient outcomes were significantly better in Magnet hospitals than in non-Magnet hospitals. However, outcomes did not improve for hospitals after they received Magnet recognition, which suggests that the Magnet program recognizes existing excellence and does not lead to additional improvements in surgical outcomes.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058006939

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26056204

DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0793


Related references

Do Magnet®-accredited hospitals show improvements in nurse and patient outcomes compared to non-Magnet hospitals: a systematic review. Jbi Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports 13(6): 168-219, 2015

Evidence-Based Practice and Job-Related Nurse Outcomes at Magnet-Aspiring, Magnet-Conforming, and Non-Magnet University Hospitals in Finland. Jona Journal of Nursing Administration 46(10): 513-520, 2016

Magnetic work environments: Patient experience outcomes in Magnet versus non-Magnet hospitals. Health Care Management Review 45(1): 21-31, 2020

Evidence-Based Practice and Job-Related Nurse Outcomes at Magnet®-Aspiring, Magnet-Conforming, and Non-Magnet University Hospitals in Finland: A Comparison Study. Journal of Nursing Administration 46(10): 513-520, 2016

Leadership practices and patient outcomes in Magnet® vs. non-Magnet hospitals. Nursing Management 50(5): 26-31, 2019

Perceptions of nurses in magnet® hospitals, non-magnet hospitals, and hospitals pursuing magnet status. Journal of Nursing Administration 41(7-8): 315-323, 2011

Comparison of patient outcomes in Magnet® and non-Magnet hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration 41(12): 517-523, 2011

Comparison of patient outcomes in Magnet® and non-magnet hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration 42(2): 65, 2012

The Magnet Nursing Services Recognition Program: a comparison of two groups of magnet hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration 39(7-8 Suppl): S5-14, 2009

Magnet and non magnet hospitals: outcomes on patients, nurses and organizations. A systematic review. Assistenza Infermieristica E Ricerca 27(4): 210-216, 2008

Nursing support, workload, and intent to stay in Magnet, Magnet-aspiring, and non-Magnet hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration 37(4): 199-205, 2007

Outcomes better in Magnet than in non-Magnet hospitals?--Not so fast. American Journal of Nursing 112(2): 16-17, 2012

Nurse outcomes in Magnet® and non-Magnet hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration 42(10 Suppl): S44, 2012

Nurse outcomes in Magnet® and non-magnet hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration 41(10): 428-433, 2011

Decisional involvement in Magnet®, magnet-aspiring, and non-magnet hospitals. Journal of Nursing Administration 42(12): 586-591, 2012