+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

How can we measure cancer literacy?--A systematic review on the quality of available measurement tools



How can we measure cancer literacy?--A systematic review on the quality of available measurement tools



Zeitschrift für Evidenz Fortbildung und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen 109(6): 466-482



Health literacy denoted as the ability to search for, understand and use health related information in health care decision-making is becoming increasingly important for complex chronic diseases such as cancer. There is growing evidence that limited health literacy has a negative impact on individual cancer prevention and disease coping behavior suggesting that interventions for quality assurance in cancer care should consider the health literacy of the target population. This poses the question of how cancer literacy should be operationalized and measured. We conducted a systematic review on available instruments to measure cancer literacy. The review was performed according to the PRISMA guideline. Relevant instruments were categorized and evaluated in regard to construct definition, operationalization approach and psychometric properties. Overall, N=12 publications reporting on the development and validation of a cancer literacy instrument could be identified. Cancer literacy is defined as the ability to search for, understand and use health related information in health care decision-making (health literacy) or as the knowledge a layperson needs to understand the information and advice the health system offers with regard to preventing, diagnosing and treating cancerous conditions. In most cases, cancer literacy is operationalized by using cancer knowledge tests across distinct knowledge areas. The analysis of the psychometric properties yields the finding that only every second paper (N=6) is reporting reliability and validity data. Altogether, reliability data is quite satisfactory whereas construct and criterion validity data demonstrates low to moderate correlations between the instruments developed and external criteria as well as comparative instruments. The aspect of cancer literacy is gaining relevance in terms of its contribution to quality assurance and patient safety. Currently, there are a limited number of cancer literacy instruments available. Definitions of constructs and instrument conceptions mostly rely on the aspect of cancer knowledge making it difficult to differentiate cancer literacy from cancer knowledge. Prospective studies should take greater account of more sophisticated measurement approaches used to assess health literacy.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058010526

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26474652

DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.06.006


Related references

The quality of mental health literacy measurement tools evaluating the stigma of mental illness: a systematic review. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 27(5): 433-462, 2018

Measurement properties of mental health literacy tools measuring help-seeking: a systematic review. Journal of Mental Health 26(6): 543-555, 2017

Airway diseases and health literacy (HL) measurement tools: A systematic review to inform respiratory research and practice. Patient Education and Counseling 101(4): 596-618, 2018

The application of health literacy measurement tools (collective or individual domains) in assessing chronic disease management: a systematic review protocol. Systematic Reviews 5: 97, 2016

Systematic Review of the Measurement Properties of Tools Used to Measure Behaviour Problems in Young Children with Autism. Plos one 10(12): E0144649, 2015

How to measure pain in neurological conditions? A systematic review of psychometric properties and clinical utility of measurement tools. Clinical Rehabilitation 28(7): 669-686, 2014

Tools to measure health literacy among Spanish speakers: An integrative review of the literature. Patient Education and Counseling 2015:, 2015

The evolution of health literacy assessment tools: a systematic review. Bmc Public Health 14: 1207, 2014

Literacy and health literacy as defined in cancer education research: A systematic review. Health Education Journal 67(4): 285-304, 2008

Assessment Tools for Health Literacy among the General Population: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(8):, 2018

Application and measurement properties of EQ-5D to measure quality of life in patients with upper extremity orthopaedic disorders: a systematic literature review. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery 138(7): 953-961, 2018

Quality of life tools for adult patients with cancer undergoing chemotherapy: a systematic review. Jbi Library of Systematic Reviews 7(16 Suppl.): 1-13, 2009

The use and impact of quality of life assessment tools in clinical care settings for cancer patients, with a particular emphasis on brain cancer: insights from a systematic review and stakeholder consultations. Quality of Life Research 25(9): 2245-2256, 2016

Personalizing prognosis in colorectal cancer: A systematic review of the quality and nature of clinical prognostic tools for survival outcomes. Journal of Surgical Oncology 116(8): 969-982, 2017

A systematic review of questionnaires to measure the impact of appearance on quality of life for head and neck cancer patients. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery 66(5): 647-659, 2013