+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

How clinicians discuss critically ill patients' preferences and values with surrogates: an empirical analysis



How clinicians discuss critically ill patients' preferences and values with surrogates: an empirical analysis



Critical Care Medicine 43(4): 757-764



Although shared decision making requires clinicians to discuss the patient's values and preferences, little is known about the extent to which this occurs with surrogates in ICUs. We sought to assess whether and how clinicians talk with surrogates about incapacitated patients' preferences and values. Prospective, cross-sectional study. Five ICUs of two hospitals. Fifty-four physicians and 159 surrogates for 71 patients. We audio-recorded 71 conferences in which clinicians and surrogates discussed life-sustaining treatment decisions for an incapacitated patient near the end of life. Two coders independently coded each instance in which clinicians or surrogates discussed the patient's previously expressed treatment preferences or values. They subcoded for values that are commonly important to patients near the end of life. They also coded treatment recommendations by clinicians that incorporated the patient's preferences or values. In 30% of conferences, there was no discussion about the patient's previously expressed preferences or values. In 37%, clinicians and surrogates discussed both the patient's treatment preferences and values. In the remaining 33%, clinicians and surrogates discussed either the patient's treatment preferences or values, but not both. In more than 88% of conferences, there was no conversation about the patient's values regarding autonomy and independence, emotional well-being and relationships, physical function, cognitive function, or spirituality. On average, 3.8% (SD, 4.3; range, 0-16%) of words spoken pertained to patient preferences or values. In roughly a third of ICU family conferences for patients at high risk of death, neither clinicians nor surrogates discussed patients' preferences or values about end-of-life decision making. In less than 12% of conferences did participants address values of high importance to most patients, such as cognitive and physical function. Interventions are needed to ensure patients' values and preferences are elicited and integrated into end-of-life decisions in ICUs.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058010602

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25565458

DOI: 10.1097/ccm.0000000000000772


Related references

Development and Pilot Testing of a Simulation to Study How Physicians Facilitate Surrogate Decision Making Based on Critically Ill Patients' Values and Preferences. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 57(2): 216-223.E8, 2019

Surrogates' agreement with patients' resuscitation preferences: effect of age, relationship, and SUPPORT intervention. Study to Understand Prognoses and Preferences for Outcomes and Risks of Treatment. Journal of Critical Care 13(3): 140-145, 1998

Life-sustaining treatment preferences: matches and mismatches between patients' preferences and clinicians' perceptions. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 46(1): 9, 2013

Ethical challenge: when clinicians act as surrogates for unrepresented patients. American Journal of Critical Care 21(3): 202-207, 2012

Prevalence of Disagreement About Appropriateness of Treatment Between ICU Patients/Surrogates and Clinicians. Chest 155(6): 1140-1147, 2019

Obesity and poor sexual health outcomes: Clinicians must be prepared to discuss sex and weight with patients. BMJ 341(7763): 56-57, 2010

How should clinicians discuss hospice for patients with dementia? Anticipating caregivers' preconceptions and meeting their information needs. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 16(2): 116-122, 2002

Surrogates' predictions of seriously ill patients' resuscitation preferences. Archives of Family Medicine 4(6): 518-523, 1995

Factors associated with illness perception among critically ill patients and surrogates. Chest 138(1): 59-67, 2010

Elderly hospitalized patients preferences to discuss CPR with their physicians. Journal of General Internal Medicine 9(4 Suppl. 2): 44, 1994

"RéaNet", the Internet utilization among surrogates of critically ill patients with sepsis. Plos one 12(3): E0174292, 2017

When to include polymyxins in the empirical antibiotic regimen in critically ill patients with fever? A decision analysis approach. Shock 27(6): 605-609, 2007

Modal preferences predict elderly patients' life-sustaining treatment choices as well as patients' chosen surrogates do. Medical Decision Making 20(3): 271-280, 2000

Characteristics of discussions on cardiopulmonary resuscitation between physicians and surrogates of critically ill patients. Journal of Critical Care 24(2): 280-287, 2009

Failure to discuss end-of-life care preferences Patients who just dont want to talk. Jgim 11(Suppl 1): 74, 1996