EurekaMag.com logo
+ Site Statistics
References:
53,869,633
Abstracts:
29,686,251
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
EurekaMag Most Shared ContentMost Shared
EurekaMag PDF Full Text ContentPDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full TextRequest PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on FacebookFollow on Facebook
Follow on TwitterFollow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedInFollow on LinkedIn

+ Translate

IMF-screws or arch bars as conservative treatment for mandibular condyle fractures: Quality of life aspects



IMF-screws or arch bars as conservative treatment for mandibular condyle fractures: Quality of life aspects



Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 43(7): 1004-1009



Arch bars as treatment for a fractured mandibular condyle are inconvenient to patients and lead to lowered quality of life (QOL). To overcome these inconveniences, IMF-screws (IMFS) to facilitate intermaxillary fixation during surgery have been developed. The purpose of the present study is to investigate and compare QOL for patients treated for a fractured mandibular condyle with either IMFS or arch bars. This research trial was conducted from 2010 to 2014 as part of an earlier prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical trial in which the use of IMFS was compared to the use of arch bars in the treatment of mandibular condylar fractures. In total, 50 patients were included: 30 (60%) male patients and 20 (40%) female patients (mean age: 31.8 years, standard deviation [SD] = 13.9 years, range = 18-64 years). A total of 24 (48%) patients were allocated in the IMFS group, and 26 (52%) patients were assigned to the arch-bars control group. Significant results were observed in the subscales social isolation, possibility to eat and vary diet, influence on sleep, and satisfaction with the given treatment, all in favour of IMFS. In conclusion, using IMFS as a method for conservative treatment of condylar fractures led to a higher QOL during the 6-week period of fracture healing. In comparison to arch bars, patients treated with IMFS experienced less social isolation, had fewer problems with eating, and express the feeling they are able to continue their normal diet. Furthermore it seems that the use of IMFS has a lower negative impact on social and financial aspects of the patient.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058031673

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26116309

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.05.009



Related references

Conservative treatment of a mandibular condyle fracture: Comparing intermaxillary fixation with screws or arch bar. A randomised clinical trial. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 43(5): 671-676, 2015

Bone-supported arch bars are associated with comparable outcomes to Erich arch bars in the treatment of mandibular fractures with intermaxillary fixation. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 73(2): 306-313, 2015

Intermaxillary fixation screws versus Erich arch bars in mandibular fractures: A comparative study and review of literature. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery 6(1): 25-30, 2016

Intermaxillary intraoperative fixation of mandibular fractures: arch bars or fixation screws?. Revue de Stomatologie, de Chirurgie Maxillo-Faciale et de Chirurgie Orale 114(5): 315-321, 2014

Mandibular fractures and treatment using arch bars. Istanbul Universitesi Dishekimligi Fakultesi Dergisi 2(3): 249-262, 1971

Conservative treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle. Dental Cadmos 54(1): 61-68, 1986

Quality of life after open versus closed treatment for mandibular condyle fractures: a review of literature. Journal of Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery 41(8): E221-E225, 2014

Poster 271: Application of Preauricular Incision for Cases of Mandibular Condylar Fractures, Luxations of the Mandibular Condyle, and Zygomatic Arch Fractures. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 65(9-Supp-S): 2147483647-0, 2007

Conservative Functional Treatment Of Luxation-Fractures Of The Mandibular Condyle. Zahnarztliche Welt, Zahnarztliche Reform, Zwr 66: 303-308, 1965

Late results of conservative treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle. Czasopismo Stomatologiczne 24(1): 41-48, 1971

Functional results after conservative treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle. British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery 45(1): 30-34, 2006

Does the Use of Hybrid Arch Bars for the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures Reduce the Length of Surgery?. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 2018

Evaluation of late results of conservative treatment of fractures of the mandibular condyle. Czasopismo Stomatologiczne 24(2): 157-161, 1971

Treatment of mandibular fractures with Michelet technique: manual fracture reduction without arch bars. Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 67(11): 2374-2379, 2009

MRI examination of the TMJ and functional results after conservative and surgical treatment of mandibular condyle fractures. International Journal Of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery. 27(1): 33-37,., 1998