+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Identification of High-Risk Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction using Strain Doppler Echocardiography: Correlation with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging



Identification of High-Risk Patients with Non-ST Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction using Strain Doppler Echocardiography: Correlation with Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging



Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology 10: 51-59



Assessment of left ventricular (LV) function is important for decision-making and risk stratification in patients with acute coronary syndrome. Many patients with non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) have substantial infarction, but these patients often do not reveal clinical signs of instability, and they rarely fulfill criteria for acute revascularization therapy. This study evaluated the potential of strain Doppler echocardiography analysis for the assessment of LV infarct size when compared with standard two-dimensional echo and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) data. Thirty patients with NSTEMI were examined using echocardiography after hospitalization for 1.8 ± 1.1 days for the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction, wall motion score index (WMSI), and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS). Infarct size was assessed using delayed enhancement CMR 6.97 ± 3.2 days after admission as a percentage of total myocardial volume. GLS was performed in 30 patients, and 82.9% of the LV segments were accepted for GLS analysis. Comparisons between patients with a complete set of GLS and standard echo, GLS and CMR were performed. The linear relationship demonstrated moderately strong and significant associations between GLS and ejection fraction (EF) as determined using standard echo (r = 0.452, P = 0.012), WMSI (r = 0.462, P = 0.010), and the gold standard CMR-determined EF (r = 0.57, P < 0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the ability of GLS to evaluate infarct size. GLS was the best predictor of infarct size in a multivariate linear regression analysis (β = 1.51, P = 0.027). WMSI >1.125 and a GLS cutoff value of -11.29% identified patients with substantial infarction (≥12% of total myocardial volume measured using CMR) with accuracies of 76.7% and 80%, respectively. However, GLS remained the only independent predictor in a multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify an infarct size ≥12%. GLS is a good predictor of infarct size in NSTEMI, and it may serve as a tool in conjunction with risk stratification scores for the selection of high-risk NSTEMI patients.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058036285

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27199575

DOI: 10.4137/cmc.s35734


Related references

Identification of High-Risk Patients After ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: Comparison Between Angiographic and Magnetic Resonance Parameters. Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging 10(6): E005841, 2017

Assessing risk following ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: cardiac troponin or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging?. European Heart Journal. Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes 2(3): 141-143, 2016

Quantifying the Area at Risk in Reperfused ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients Using Hybrid Cardiac Positron Emission Tomography-Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging 9(3): E003900, 2016

Prognostic value of high sensitivity troponin T after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in the era of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. European Heart Journal. Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes 2(3): 164-171, 2016

Season and myocardial injury in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study. Plos One 14(2): E0211807, 2019

Optimized Prognosis Assessment in ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Using a Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Risk Score. Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging 10(11), 2017

Prognostic value of myocardial deformation imaging by cardiac magnetic resonance feature-tracking in patients with a first ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. International Journal of Cardiology 271: 387-391, 2018

Longitudinal strain provides prognositic value, incremental to that of cardiac magnetic resonance at the acute phase in patients with st-segment elevation myocardial infarction. European Heart Journal 34(Suppl 1): P470-P470, 2013

Significance of exercise-induced ST segment elevation in Q leads in patients with a recent myocardial infarction and an open infarct-related artery Analysis with angiography, intracoronary myocardial contrast echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance. International Journal of Cardiology 103(1): 85-91, 2005

Bedside assessment of myocardial viability using transmural strain profile in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction: comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography 22(9): 1015-1021, 2009

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Myocardial Strain After Acute ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review. Circulation. Cardiovascular Imaging 10(8), 2017

Chronic ischemic mitral regurgitation and papillary muscle infarction detected by late gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Clinical Research in Cardiology 105(12): 981-991, 2016

Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging findings in non-ST-segment elevation versus ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients undergoing early invasive intervention. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 28(6): 1487-1497, 2013

Detection of left ventricular thrombus with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute st-segment elevation myocardial infarction (stemi). 2007

Prognostic Value of Strain by Tissue Tracking Cardiac Magnetic Resonance After ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction. Jacc. Cardiovascular Imaging 11(10): 1448-1457, 2017