+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Identification of low variability textural features for heterogeneity quantification of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging



Identification of low variability textural features for heterogeneity quantification of 18 F-FDG PET/CT imaging



Revista Espanola de Medicina Nuclear E Imagen Molecular 35(6): 379-384



To identify those textural features that are insensitive to both technical and biological factors in order to standardise heterogeneity studies on 18F-FDG PET imaging. Two different studies were performed. First, nineteen series from a cylindrical phantom filled with different 18F-FDG activity concentration were acquired and reconstructed using three different protocols. Seventy-two texture features were calculated inside a circular region of interest. The variability of each feature was obtained. Second, the data for 15 patients showing non-pathological liver were acquired. Anatomical and physiological features such as patient's weight, height, body mass index, metabolic active volume, blood glucose level, SUV and SUV standard deviation were also recorded. A liver covering region of interest was delineated and low variability textural features calculated in each patient. Finally, a multivariate Spearman's correlation analysis between biological factors and texture features was performed. Only eight texture features analysed show small variability (<5%) with activity concentration and reconstruction protocol making them suitable for heterogeneity quantification. On the other hand, there is a high statistically significant correlation between MAV and entropy (P<0.05). Entropy feature is, indeed, correlated (P<0.05) with all patient parameters, except body mass index. The textural features that are correlated with neither technical nor biological factors are run percentage, short-zone emphasis and intensity, making them suitable for quantifying functional changes or classifying patients. Other textural features are correlated with technical and biological factors and are, therefore, a source of errors if used for this purpose.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058039840

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27174866

DOI: 10.1016/j.remn.2016.04.002


Related references

18 F-FDG PET/CT heterogeneity quantification through textural features in the era of harmonisation programs: a focus on lung cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 43(13): 2324-2335, 2016

Differentiating the grades of thymic epithelial tumor malignancy using textural features of intratumoral heterogeneity via (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Annals of Nuclear Medicine 30(4): 309-319, 2016

Temporal analysis of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity characterized by textural features in cervical cancer. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 40(5): 716-727, 2013

Variability of textural features in FDG PET images due to different acquisition modes and reconstruction parameters. Acta Oncologica 49(7): 1012-1016, 2011

Textural features for grain identification. International Agricultural Engineering Journal 8(4): 213-222, 1999

Intratumor heterogeneity characterized by textural features on baseline 18F-FDG PET images predicts response to concomitant radiochemotherapy in esophageal cancer. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 52(3): 369-378, 2011

Identification of cell cycle compartments by textural and chromatin features. Analytical & Quantitative Cytology 4(2): 140, 1982

A preliminary investigation into textural features of intratumoral metabolic heterogeneity in (18)F-FDG PET for overall survival prognosis in patients with bulky cervical cancer treated with definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy. American Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging 6(3): 166-175, 2016

Text-independent writer identification and verification using textural and allographic features. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 29(4): 701-717, 2007

Identification and filtering of rainfall and ground radar echoes using textural features. International Journal of Remote Sensing 25(21): 4641-4656, 2004

Automated identification of man-made textural features on satellite imagery by Bayesian networks. PEandRS, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 70(2): 211-216, 2004

High-Throughput Quantification of Phenotype Heterogeneity Using Statistical Features. Advances in Bioinformatics 2015: 728164, 2015

Predicting Response to Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy in Esophageal Cancer with Textural Features Derived from Pretreatment 18 F-FDG PET/CT Imaging. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 58(5): 723-729, 2016

Identification of natural images and computer-generated graphics based on statistical and textural features. Journal of Forensic Sciences 60(2): 435-443, 2014

Quantification of heterogeneity as a biomarker in tumor imaging: a systematic review. Plos One 9(10): E110300, 2015