+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials



Improved participants' understanding of research information in real settings using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled informed consent study nested with eight clinical trials



European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 73(2): 141-149



This study aimed to test the applicability and effectiveness of the principles and informed consent form (ICF) template proposed by the Strategic Initiative for Developing Capacity in Ethical Review (SIDCER) across multiple clinical trials involving Thai research participants with various conditions. A single-center, randomized-controlled study nested with eight clinical trials was conducted at Thammasat University Hospital, Thailand. A total of 258 participants from any of the eight clinical trials were enrolled and randomly assigned to read either the SIDCER ICF (n = 130) or the conventional ICF (n = 128) of the respective trial. Their understanding of necessary information was assessed using the post-test questionnaire; they were allowed to consult a given ICF while completing the questionnaire. The primary endpoint was the proportion of the participants who had the post-test score of ≥80%, and the secondary endpoint was the total score of the post-test. The proportion of the participants in the SIDCER ICF group who achieved the primary endpoint was significantly higher than that of the conventional ICF group (60.8 vs. 41.4%, p = 0.002). The total score of the post-test was also significantly higher among the participants who read the SIDCER ICF than those who read the conventional ICF (83.3 vs. 76.0%, p < 0.001). The present study demonstrated that the SIDCER ICF was applicable and effective to improve Thai research participants' understanding of research information in diverse clinical trials. Using the SIDCER ICF methodology, clinical researchers can improve the quality of ICFs for their trials.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058072255

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27838760

DOI: 10.1007/s00228-016-2159-1


Related references

Improved participants' understanding in a healthy volunteer study using the SIDCER informed consent form: a randomized-controlled study. European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 72(4): 413-421, 2016

Improved pregnant women's understanding of research information by an enhanced informed consent form: a randomised controlled study nested in neonatal research. Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition 103(5): F403-F407, 2018

Informed consent in medical research. In routine practice the consent form is a request form and informed consent is informed choice. Bmj 314(7092): 1482-1483, 1997

Informing research participants of research results An analysis of pediatric informed consent conferences in randomized controlled trials. Blood 102(11): 202a, 2003

Improved informed consent documents for biomedical research do not increase patients' understanding but reduce enrolment: a study in real settings. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology 80(5): 1010-1020, 2015

Informed Consent for Screening in the Antenatal Care Process: Are We Really Counselling Patients to Allow an Informed Understanding and "Real" Consent?. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada 39(10): 919-921, 2017

Perception of the informed consent form by participants in clinical trials. Investigacion Y Educacion en Enfermeria 32(1): 97, 2014

Informed consent in randomised controlled trials: development and preliminary evaluation of a measure of Participatory and Informed Consent (PIC). Trials 18(1): 327, 2017

Clinical trial informed consent information for participants can be improved. Ugeskrift for Laeger 178(32): -, 2016

Participants' Understanding of Informed Consent in a Randomized Controlled Trial for Chronic Knee Pain. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 10(5): 435-443, 2015

Quality of informed consent: measuring understanding among participants in oncology clinical trials. Oncology Nursing Forum 32(4): 751-755, 2005

Participants with schizophrenia retain the information necessary for informed consent during clinical trials. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 74(6): 622-627, 2013

Participants' understanding of a randomized controlled trial (RCT) through informed consent procedures in the RCT for breast cancer screening, J-START. Trials 15: 375, 2014

Informed consent as an ethical requirement in clinical trials: an old, but still unresolved issue. An observational study to evaluate patient's informed consent comprehension. Journal of Medical Ethics 40(4): 269-275, 2014

Participants' understanding of informed consent in clinical trials over three decades: systematic review and meta-analysis. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 93(3): 186-98h, 2015