+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Initial impressions: What they are, what they are not, and how they influence structured interview outcomes



Initial impressions: What they are, what they are not, and how they influence structured interview outcomes



Journal of Applied Psychology 101(5): 625-638



Nearly all employment interviews, even those considered highly structured, begin with a brief meet-and-greet conversation typically coalescing around non-job-related topics (i.e., rapport building). Although applicants and interviewers often view rapport building as an essential, value-adding component of the interview, it may contaminate interviewers' evaluations of answers to subsequently asked structured questions (Levashina, Hartwell, Morgeson, & Campion, 2014). Yet research has not determined the extent to which initial impressions developed during rapport building influence subsequent interviewer ratings through job-related interview content versus non-job-related content; whether these effects extend beyond more commonly examined image-related factors that can bias interviewers (i.e., self-presentation tactics); or how these effects are temporally bound when influencing interviewer ratings during the formal structured interview question-and-answer process. Addressing these questions, we integrate interview research with the extant social psychology literature to clarify rapport building's unique effects in the employment interview. In contrast to prior assumptions, findings based on 163 mock interviews suggest that a significant portion of initial impressions' influence overlaps with job-related interview content and, importantly, that these effects are distinct from other image-related constructs. Finally, initial impressions are found to more strongly relate to interviewer evaluations of applicant responses earlier rather than later in the structured interview. (PsycINFO Database Record

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058122393

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26727208

DOI: 10.1037/apl0000077


Related references

A structured interview guide for global impressions: increasing reliability and scoring accuracy for CNS trials. Annals of General Psychiatry 12(1): 2, 2013

Managing and creating an image in the interview: the role of interviewee initial impressions. Journal of Applied Psychology 96(6): 1275-1288, 2011

Development and initial validation of the Structured Interview for Self-Destructive Behaviors. Journal of Trauma and Dissociation 14(3): 312-327, 2013

The Structured Interview & Scoring Tool-Massachusetts Alzheimer's Disease Research Center (SIST-M): development, reliability, and cross-sectional validation of a brief structured clinical dementia rating interview. Archives of Neurology 68(3): 343-350, 2011

A structured interview for medical school admission, Phase 1: initial procedures and results. Academic Medicine 76(1): 66-71, 2001

Development and Initial Psychometric Evaluation of the Semi-Structured Emotion Regulation Interview. Journal of Personality Assessment 99(1): 56-66, 2016

The structured diagnostic interview for sleep patterns and disorders: rationale and initial evaluation. Sleep Medicine 15(5): 530-535, 2014

Initial validation of the Russian version of the World Mental Health Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV. Israel Journal of Psychiatry and Related Sciences 50(1): 24-32, 2013

Improving the assessment of outcomes in stroke: use of a structured interview to assign grades on the modified Rankin Scale. Stroke 33(9): 2243-2246, 2002

Prospective diagnosis of the initial prodrome for Schizophrenia based on the Structured Interview for Prodromal Syndromes: Preliminary evidence of interrater reliability and predictive validity. American Journal of Psychiatry 159(5): 863-865, 2002

Influence of a child's race and the EMR label on initial impressions of regular-classroom teachers. American Journal of Mental Deficiency 85(6): 619-623, 1981

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft. Spine Journal 4(2): 184-91; Discussion 191, 2004

Development, validation and initial outcomes of a questionnaire to examine human factors in postgraduate surgical objective structured clinical examinations. British Journal of Surgery 102(4): 423-430, 2015

Earwitness recall and identification: comparison of the cognitive interview and the structured interview. Perceptual and Motor Skills 88(3 Pt 1): 797-807, 1999