+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Is it a matter of urgency? A survey of assessments by walk-in patients and doctors of the urgency level of their encounters at a general emergency outpatient clinic in Oslo, Norway



Is it a matter of urgency? A survey of assessments by walk-in patients and doctors of the urgency level of their encounters at a general emergency outpatient clinic in Oslo, Norway



Bmc Emergency Medicine 16(1): 22



Emergency room (ER) use is increasing in several countries. Variability in the proportion of non-urgent ER visits was found to range from 5 to 90 % (median 32 %). Non-urgent emergency visits are considered an inappropriate and inefficient use of the health-care system because they may lead to higher expenses, crowding, treatment delays, and loss of continuity of health care provided by a general practitioner. Urgency levels of doctor-walk-in patient encounters were assessed based on their region of origin in a diverse Norwegian population. An anonymous, multilingual questionnaire was distributed to all walk-in patients at a general emergency outpatient clinic in Oslo during two weeks in September 2009. We analysed demographic data, patient-doctor assessments of the level of urgency, and the results of the consultation. We used descriptive statistics to obtain frequencies with 95 % confidence interval (CI) for assessed levels of urgency and outcomes. Concordance between the patients' and doctors' assessments was analysed using a Kendall tau-b test. We used binary logistic regression modelling to quantify associations of explanatory variables and outcomes according to urgency level assessments. The analysis included 1821 walk-in patients. Twenty-four per cent of the patients considered their emergency consultation to be non-urgent, while the doctors considered 64 % of encounters to be non-urgent. The concordance between the assessments by the patient and by their doctor was positive but low, with a Kendall tau-b coefficient of 0.202 (p < 0.001). Adjusted logistic regression analysis showed that patients from Eastern Europe (odds ratio (OR) = 3.04; 95 % CI 1.60-5.78), Asia and Turkey (OR = 4.08; 95 % CI 2.43-6.84), and Africa (OR = 8.47; 95 % CI 3.87-18.5) reported significantly higher urgency levels compared with Norwegians. The doctors reported no significant difference in assessment of urgency based on the patient's region of origin, except for Africans (OR = 0.64; 95 % CI 0.43-0.96). This study reveals discrepancies between assessments by walk-in patients and doctors of the urgency level of their encounters at a general emergency clinic. The patients' self-assessed perception of the urgency level was related to their region of origin.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058168562

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27378228

DOI: 10.1186/s12873-016-0086-1


Related references

Reasons for attending a general emergency outpatient clinic versus a regular general practitioner - a survey among immigrant and native walk-in patients in Oslo, Norway. Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care 35(1): 35-45, 2017

Use of emergency care services by immigrants—a survey of walk-in patients who attended the Oslo Accident and Emergency Outpatient Clinic. Bmc Emergency Medicine 15: 25, 2015

How do patients and physicians rate urgency of care? A comparison of urgency ratings for general surgery. Hospital Quarterly 5(3): 34-40, 2002

Patients presenting with acute poisoning to an outpatient emergency clinic: a one-year observational study in Oslo, Norway. Bmc Emergency Medicine 15: 18, 2015

Emergency physicians' and patients' assessments: urgency of need for medical care. Annals of Emergency Medicine 9(10): 502-507, 1980

Psychiatric urgency as assessed by patients and their therapists at an adult outpatient clinic. Hospital and Community Psychiatry 33(8): 663-664, 1982

Validation of urgency scale to detect and assess urgency in patients with overactive bladder. Urologiia 2016(2 Suppl 2): 82-86, 2016

Mirabegron escalation to 50 mg further improves daily urgency and urgency urinary incontinence in Asian patients with overactive bladder. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association 118(3): 700-706, 2019

Emergency medical transport of the elderly demographics and level of urgency. Clinical Research 39(4): 888A, 1991

Triaging and coding ophthalmic emergency: the Rome Eye Scoring System for Urgency and Emergency (RESCUE): a pilot study of 1,000 eye-dedicated emergency room patients. European Journal of Ophthalmology 17(3): 413-417, 2007

Reasons for encounter by different levels of urgency in out-of-hours emergency primary health care in Norway: a cross sectional study. Bmc Emergency Medicine 17(1): 19, 2017

Four years experience with augmentation cystoplasty in patients with urgency or urge in patients with urgency or urge incontinence. Scandinavian Journal of Urology and Nephrology Suppl. (135): 34, 1991

A comparison of two models of Urgency: Urgency predicts both rash action and depression in youth. Clinical Psychological Science 1(3): 266-275, 2013

Urgency severity and bother questionnaire (USBO) - A new validated questionnarie for the evaluation of urgency. Neurourology and Urodynamics 27(2): 144-145, 2008

Evaluation of urgency in women, with a validated Urgency, Severity and Impact Questionnaire (USIQ). International Urogynecology Journal and Pelvic Floor Dysfunction 20(3): 301-307, 2009