+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Monitoring Inhaler Inhalations Using an Acoustic Sensor Proximal to Inhaler Devices



Monitoring Inhaler Inhalations Using an Acoustic Sensor Proximal to Inhaler Devices



Journal of Aerosol Medicine and Pulmonary Drug Delivery 29(5): 439-446



The efficacy of drug delivery from inhalers is very much dependent on the user's peak inspiratory flow rate (PIFR). Current methods to measure PIFR in inhalers are based on subjective checklists. There is a lack of methods currently available to objectively remotely monitor PIFR in pressurized metered dose inhalers (pMDIs) and dry powder inhalers (DPIs). In this study, for the first time, non-contact acoustic methods were employed to estimate PIFR through three commonly used inhalers (Diskus™ DPI, Turbuhaler™ DPI, and Evohaler™ pMDI) with the aim of applying these methods to remotely monitor inhaler inhalation technique in future clinical applications. Each inhaler was placed inside an airtight container connected to a spirometer to measure PIFR. A high quality microphone was placed 5 cm from the mouthpiece of the inhalers to record inhalation sounds. Over 2000 inhaler inhalation sounds were recorded from 11 healthy participants. A range of temporal and spectral acoustic features from the inhalation sounds were correlated with PIFR. The variation of acoustic features and the repeatability of the inhalation acoustic spectral profile were investigated to further characterize inhaler inhalation sounds and to determine the reliability of acoustics to estimate PIFR. All acoustic features were significantly correlated with PIFR (p < 0.001). The mean power of the inhalation sound generated the most consistent correlation across all inhalers [R2 = 0.77 (Diskus™), R2 = 0.7 (Turbuhaler™), R2 = 0.75 (Evohaler™)]. Acoustic features generated low variation and the spectral profile of inhalation sounds was repeatable regardless of flow rate, suggesting that acoustic methods are a reliable method of estimating PIFR. The methods presented in this study may be employed in a wearable monitoring device in future applications to measure inhaler PIFR. Objective monitoring of PIFR in inhalers may help patients improve their inhaler inhalation technique and therefore may be of significant clinical benefit to both patients and clinicians.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058343545

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26859629

DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2015.1276


Related references

A critical comparison of the dose delivery characteristics of four alternative inhalation devices delivering salbutamol: pressurized metered dose inhaler, Diskus inhaler, Diskhaler inhaler, and Turbuhaler inhaler. Journal of Aerosol Medicine 12(2): 75-84, 1999

Metered-dose inhaler add-on devices: an in vitro evaluation of the BronchoAir inhaler and several spacer devices. Journal of Aerosol Medicine 11(3): 133-142, 1998

A method to assess adherence in inhaler use through analysis of acoustic recordings of inhaler events. Plos one 9(6): E98701, 2014

Inhaler devices in asthma and COPD--an assessment of inhaler technique and patient preferences. Respiratory Medicine 108(7): 968-975, 2014

Inhaler preference and technique in inhaler naive subjects; a comparison of HFA and conventional devices. Thorax 55(Suppl. 3): A61, 2000

The efficacy of a new salbutamol metered-dose powder inhaler in comparison with two other inhaler devices. Respiratory Medicine 95(12): 949-953, 2001

The importance of inhaler devices: the choice of inhaler device may lead to suboptimal adherence in COPD patients. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 10: 2335-2345, 2015

Inhaler technique and patient's preference for dry powder inhaler devices. Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery 11(1): 1-3, 2014

Differences in inhaler technique between inhaler devices A systematic review. Thorax 55(Suppl. 3): A63, 2000

Handling of inhaler devices in actual pulmonary practice: metered-dose inhaler versus dry powder inhalers. Respiratory Care 53(3): 324-328, 2008

The Importance of Inhaler Devices: An Incorrect Inhaler Technique Leads to Suboptimal Medication Compliance In Patients With Copd. Value in Health 18(7): A362-A362, 2015

Patient preferences for inhaler devices in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: experience with Respimat Soft Mist inhaler. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 4: 381-390, 2009

Inhaler usability of a pressurized metered dose inhaler and a soft mist inhaler in patients with COPD: A simulated-use study. Chronic Respiratory Disease 16: 1479972318787914, 2018

Clinical effectiveness of the Respimat inhaler device in managing chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: evidence when compared with other handheld inhaler devices. International Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease 6: 129-139, 2011

Comparison of Diskus inhaler, a new multidose powder inhaler, with Diskhaler inhaler for the delivery of salmeterol to asthmatic patients. Canadian Study Group. Journal of Asthma 32(6): 429-436, 1995