+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors



Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors



Annals of Oncology 26(9): 1846-1858



This review focused on the identification of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) used in routine cancer clinical practice, the impact on patient, provider, and system outcomes, and the implementation factors influencing uptake. A scoping review of the published health literature was conducted using empirical databases, namely, Ovid Medline (2003 to September 2013), CINAHL (2003-2013) and PsycINFO (2003-2013). Scoping reviews are systematic literature reviews in a broad topic area that provide relevant and quantified results about the knowledge available on a particular topic and aim to rapidly map and synthesize the evidence to emphasize what is known. From a total of 2447 unique publications, 30 articles that met eligibility criteria were reviewed. PRO use appears to be acceptable to patients, enables earlier detection of symptoms and may improve communication between clinicians and patients. However, the impact of routine PROMs collection on health outcomes is less clear and high-quality research is still warranted. PROMs use in routine cancer clinical practice is growing with improvements on essential care processes shown but a number of implementation barriers must still be addressed. The lack of standardization in PROMs used in cancer organizations may make it difficult to use these data for quality monitoring in the future.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058514273

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25888610

DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdv181


Related references

Impact of an Automatically Generated Cancer Survivorship Care Plan on Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Clinical Practice: Longitudinal Outcomes of a Pragmatic, Cluster Randomized Trial. Journal of Clinical Oncology 33(31): 3550-3559, 2016

What is the value of the routine use of patient-reported outcome measures toward improvement of patient outcomes, processes of care, and health service outcomes in cancer care? A systematic review of controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Oncology 32(14): 1480-1501, 2014

The impact of measuring patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice: a systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research 17(2): 179-193, 2008

The Impact of Measuring Patient-Reported Outcomes in Clinical Practice: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Quality of Life Research 17(2): 179-193, 2008

A relevant study was missed in our systematic review on the impact of patient-reported outcomes in clinical practice. Quality of Life Research 17(6): 965-966, 2008

Clinical Relevance of Routine Monitoring of Patient-reported Outcomes Versus Clinician-reported Outcomes in Oncology. In Vivo 33(1): 17-21, 2018

Systemwide Implementation of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Routine Clinical Care at a Children's Hospital. Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety 44(8): 441-453, 2018

Patient-reported outcomes following neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy treatment for esophageal cancer: a scoping review protocol. Jbi Database of Systematic Reviews and Implementation Reports 15(6): 1499-1507, 2018

Integrating patient reported outcomes with clinical cancer registry data: a feasibility study of the electronic Patient-Reported Outcomes From Cancer Survivors (ePOCS) system. Journal of Medical Internet Research 15(10): E230, 2014

Are patient-reported outcomes useful in post-treatment follow-up care for women with early breast cancer? A scoping review. Patient Related Outcome Measures 10: 117-127, 2019

Montreal Accord on Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) use series - Paper 8: patient-reported outcomes in electronic health records can inform clinical and policy decisions. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 89: 160-167, 2017

Standardizing patient-reported outcomes assessment in cancer clinical trials: a patient-reported outcomes measurement information system initiative. Journal of Clinical Oncology 25(32): 5106-5112, 2007

Electronic real-time assessment of patient-reported outcomes in routine care-first findings and experiences from the implementation in a comprehensive cancer center. Supportive Care in Cancer 24(7): 3047-3056, 2017

The use of patient-reported outcomes becomes standard practice in the routine clinical care of lung-heart transplant patients. Patient Related Outcome Measures 1: 93-105, 2010

Capturing patient reported outcomes and quality of life in routine clinical practice: ready for prime time?. Minerva Gastroenterologica E Dietologica 58(1): 19-24, 2012