+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Perspectives of Decisional Surrogates and Patients Regarding Critical Illness Genetic Research



Perspectives of Decisional Surrogates and Patients Regarding Critical Illness Genetic Research



Ajob Empirical Bioethics 7(1): 39-47



Critical illness research is challenging due to disease severity and because patients are frequently incapacitated. Surrogates called upon to provide consent might not accurately represent patient preferences. Though commonplace, genetic data collection adds complexity in this context. We undertook this investigation to understand whether surrogate decision makers would be receptive to permitting participation in a critical illness genetics study and whether their decision making was consistent with that of the patient represented. We invited individuals identified as surrogates for critically ill adults, if required, as well as patients once recovered to participate in a survey designed to understand attitudes about genetic research. Associations between dependent (receptivity to participation, concordance of responses) and independent variables were tested using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Most of the entire surrogate sample (n=439) reported familiarity with research, including genetic research; tended to view research as useful; and were receptive to allowing their family member participate (with 39.6% and 38.1% stating that this would be "very" and "somewhat likely," respectively) even absent direct benefit. Willingness to participate was similar comparing genetic and non-genetic studies (χ2 [1,n=439]=0.00127, p=0.972), though respondents expressed worry regarding lack of confidentiality of genetic data. Responses were concordant in 70.8% of the 192 surrogate-patient pairs analyzed. In multivariate analysis, African American race was associated with less receptivity to genetic data collection (p<0.05). No factors associated with concordance of surrogate-patient response were identified. Surrogates' receptivity to critical illness research was not influenced by whether the study entailed collection of genetic data. While more than two-thirds of surrogate-patient responses for participation in genetics research were concordant, concerns expressed regarding genetic data often related to breach of confidentiality. Emphasizing safeguards in place to minimize such breeches might prove an effective strategy for enhancing recruitment.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058536290

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26752784

DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2015.1039148


Related references

Genetic research and testing in critical care: surrogates' perspective. Critical Care Medicine 34(4): 986-994, 2006

Patients' and surrogates' perspective on research and testing in critical care. Critical Care Medicine 35(1): 328; Author Reply 328-9, 2007

Patients and surrogates perspective on research and testing in critical care. Critical Care Medicine 35(1): 328-329, 2007

Prior Advance Care Planning Is Associated with Less Decisional Conflict among Surrogates for Critically Ill Patients. Annals of the American Thoracic Society 12(10): 1528-1533, 2015

Surrogate receptivity to participation in critical illness genetic research: aligning research oversight and stakeholder concerns. Chest 147(4): 979-988, 2015

Does difficulty functioning in the surrogate role equate to vulnerability in critical illness research? Use of path analysis to examine the relationship between difficulty providing substituted judgment and receptivity to critical illness research participation. Journal of Critical Care 30(6): 1310-1316, 2015

Real-time perspectives of surrogate decision-makers regarding critical illness research: findings of focus group participants. Chest 142(6): 1433-1439, 2012

The Assessment of Decisional Capacity: Gender Differences, Corresponding Medical and Psychiatric Illness, and Their Impact on Decisional Capacity. International Journal of Mental Health 44(3): 159-168, 2015

Differences in hospital glycemic control and insulin requirements in patients recovering from critical illness and those without prior critical illness. Clinical Pharmacology 2: 143-148, 2010

Chronic critical illness should be considered in long-term mortality study among critical illness patients. Critical Care Medicine 43(2): E57, 2015

Protocols and Hospital Mortality in Critically Ill Patients: The United States Critical Illness and Injury Trials Group Critical Illness Outcomes Study. Critical Care Medicine 43(10): 2076-2084, 2015

When does decisional impairment become decisional incompetence? Ethical and methodological issues in capacity research in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin 32(1): 92-97, 2006

Factors associated with illness perception among critically ill patients and surrogates. Chest 138(1): 59-67, 2010

Decisional conflict in end-of-life cancer treatment among family surrogates: A cross-sectional survey. Nursing and Health Sciences 20(4): 472-478, 2018

Critical review of norovirus surrogates in food safety research: rationale for considering volunteer studies. Food and Environmental Virology 4(1): 6, 2012