+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Presbyopic correction on the cornea



Presbyopic correction on the cornea



Eye and Vision 1: 5



The aim of this systematic review was to synthesize and appraise the evidence of the benefits of presbyopic correction on the cornea for visual function. Comprehensive search was conducted in MEDLINE using keywords like "presbylasik", "presbyopic refractive surgery", "corneal pseudoaccommodation" and "corneal multifocality". We reviewed corrected and uncorrected visual acuities for distance and near (uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA), corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), corrected near visual acuity (CNVA)), along with the refractive outcomes in spherical equivalent (SE) and astigmatism comparing the differences observed between preoperative myopic and hyperopic patients, as well as among techniques. Thirty-one studies met the inclusion and quality criteria. Monovision provides excellent distance and near uncorrected acuities, but with a 17% retreatment and a 5% reversal rate. Initial multifocal ablations result in 12% loss of 2 or more lines of CDVA, and a 21% retreatment rate. Laser Blended Vision provides excellent UDVA, but with a 19% retreatment rate. Initial experiences with Supracor show moderate predictability and a 22% retreatment rate. Intracor results in 9% loss of 2 or more lines of CDVA. KAMRA provides excellent UDVA, with only a 1% retreatment rate, but a 6% reversal rate. Initial experiences with PresbyMAX provided excellent UNVA and DCNVA, showing excellent predictability and a 1% reversal rate. The findings have implications for clinicians and policymakers in the health-care industry and emphasize the need for additional trials examining this important and widely performed clinical procedure.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058609849

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26605352

DOI: 10.1186/s40662-014-0005-z


Related references

Presbyopic correction with contact lenses. Ophthalmology Clinics of North America 16(3): 365-381, 2003

Association of presbyopic correction with changes in visual fields. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 28(3): 165-168, 2000

Visual function with presbyopic contact lens correction. Optometry and Vision Science 67(1): 22-28, 1990

Comparative study of multifocal LASIK for the correction of pre-presbyopic myopia. Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology 44(7): 596-602, 2008

Quantification of ghosting produced with presbyopic contact lens correction. Eye and Contact Lens 38(4): 252-259, 2012

The effect of increase of intensity of light on the visual acuity of presbyopic and non-presbyopic eyes. Trans Illumin Engineer Soc 29(4): 296-313, 1934

Objective quality of vision in presbyopic and non-presbyopic patients after pseudoaccommodative advanced surface ablation. Journal of Refractive Surgery 21(5 Suppl): S603-S605, 2005

The effectiveness of multifocal correction upon presbyopic near and intermediate visual resolution performance. Journal of the American Optometric Association 55(10): 753-757, 1984

Presbyopic correction as a function of scleral expansion using a 3 d model of the catenary diaphragm. ARVO Annual Meeting Abstract Search & Program Planner : Abstract No 241, 2003

Presbyopic LASIK using hybrid bi-aspheric micro-monovision ablation profile for presbyopic corneal treatments. American Journal of Ophthalmology 160(3): 493-505, 2015

Lens fluorescence and accommodative amplitude in pre-presbyopic and presbyopic subjects. Experimental Eye Research 84(5): 1013-1017, 2007

Monovision laser in situ keratomileusis for pre-presbyopic and presbyopic patients. Journal of Refractive Surgery 20(4): 325-328, 2004

Visual quality after monovision correction by laser in situ keratomileusis in presbyopic patients. Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 37(9): 1629-1635, 2012

Investigating the utility of clinical assessments to predict success with presbyopic contact lens correction. Contact Lens and Anterior Eye 39(5): 322-330, 2017