+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score in Acute Chest Pain Patients Without Known Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis



Prognostic Value of Coronary Artery Calcium Score in Acute Chest Pain Patients Without Known Coronary Artery Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis



Annals of Emergency Medicine 68(6): 659-670



Coronary artery calcium score (CACS) is a well-established test for risk stratifying asymptomatic patients. Recent studies also indicate that CACS may accurately risk stratify stable patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute chest pain; however, many were underpowered. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the prognostic value and accuracy of a zero (normal) CACS for identifying patients at acceptable low risk for future cardiovascular events who might be safely discharged home from the ED. We searched multiple databases for longitudinal studies of CACS in symptomatic patients without known coronary artery disease that reported major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), including death and myocardial infarction. Pooled risk ratios, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios were analyzed. Eight studies evaluated 3,556 patients, with a median follow-up of 10.5 months. Pooled prevalence of zero CACS was 60%. Patients with CACS=0 had a significantly lower risk of cardiovascular events compared with those with CACS greater than 0 (MACEs: relative risk 0.06, 95% confidence interval 0.04 to 0.11, I2=0%; death/myocardial infarction: relative risk 0.19; 95% confidence interval 0.08 to 0.47, I2=0%). The pooled event rates for CACS=0 (MACEs 0.8%/year; death/myocardial infarction 0.5%/year) were significantly lower than for CACS greater than 0 (MACEs 14.6%/year; death/myocardial infarction 3.5%/year). Analysis of summary testing parameters showed a sensitivity of 96%, specificity of 60%, positive likelihood ratio of 2.36, and negative likelihood ratio of 0.07. Acute chest pain patients without history of coronary artery disease, ischemic ECG changes, or increased cardiac enzyme levels commonly have a CACS of zero, with a very low subsequent risk of MACEs or death or myocardial infarction. This meta-analysis proffers the potential role of initial CACS testing for avoiding unnecessary hospitalization and further cardiac testing in acute chest pain patients with a CACS of zero.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058635465

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27765299

DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.07.020


Related references

Additive prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score and renal function in patients with acute chest pain without known coronary artery disease: up to 5-year follow-up. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 31(8): 1619-1626, 2015

Using the coronary artery calcium score to predict coronary heart disease events: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Internal Medicine 164(12): 1285-1292, 2004

Usefulness of CHADS 2 score for prognostic stratification of patients with coronary artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. International Journal of Cardiology 228: 906-911, 2017

Independent prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score and coronary computed tomography angiography in an outpatient cohort of low to intermediate risk chest pain patients. Netherlands Heart Journal 24(5): 332-342, 2016

Percutaneous coronary intervention compared with coronary artery bypass graft in coronary artery disease patients with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Renal Failure 36(8): 1177-1186, 2014

Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score in patients with symptoms suggestive of coronary artery disease. Results from the Silesian Calcium Score (SILICAS) study. Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej 126(6): 395-401, 2016

Additive prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score over coronary computed tomographic angiography stenosis assessment in symptomatic patients without known coronary artery disease. American Journal of Cardiology 115(6): 738-744, 2015

Prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score and coronary CT angiography in patients with intermediate risk of coronary artery disease. International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging 28(6): 1547-1556, 2012

Novel Emergency Department Risk Score Discriminates Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Chest Pain Patients With Known Coronary Artery Disease. Critical Pathways in Cardiology 15(4): 138-144, 2016

Impact of combined assessment of coronary artery calcium score, carotid artery plaque score, and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity for early coronary revascularization in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. International Heart Journal 53(3): 154-159, 2012

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization vs Complete Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Invasive Cardiology 30(12): E131, 2018

Hybrid coronary revascularization versus coronary artery bypass grafting for multivessel coronary artery disease: systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery 10: 63, 2015

Incremental prognostic value of coronary artery calcium score versus CT angiography among symptomatic patients without known coronary artery disease. Atherosclerosis 233(1): 190-195, 2014

Validity of Coronary Artery Disease Consortium Models for Predicting Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease & Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Acute Chest Pain Considered for Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography. American Journal of Cardiology 122(8): 1310-1321, 2018

Comparison of coronary artery bypass grafting and drug-eluting stents in patients with left main coronary artery disease and chronic kidney disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 2019:, 2019