+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Prognostic value of preoperative inflammatory response biomarkers in patients with esophageal cancer who undergo a curative thoracoscopic esophagectomy



Prognostic value of preoperative inflammatory response biomarkers in patients with esophageal cancer who undergo a curative thoracoscopic esophagectomy



Bmc Surgery 16(1): 66



Several inflammatory response biomarkers, including lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been reported to predict survival in various cancers. The aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical value of these biomarkers in patients undergoing curative resection for esophageal cancer. The LMR, NLR and PLR were calculated in 147 consecutive patients who underwent esophagectomy between January 2006 and February 2015. We examined the prognostic significance of the LMR, NLR, and PLR in both elderly and non-elderly patients. We evaluated the cancer-specific survival (CSS), with the cause of death determined from the case notes or computerized records. Univariate analyses demonstrated that TNM pStage (p < 0.0001), tumor size (p = 0.0014), operation time (p = 0.0209), low LMR (p = 0.0008), and high PLR (p = 0.0232) were significant risk factors for poor prognosis. Meanwhile, TNM pStage (p < 0.0001) and low LMR (p = 0.0129) were found to be independently associated with poor prognosis via multivariate analysis. In non-elderly patients, univariate analyses demonstrated that TNM pStage (p < 0.0001), tumor size (p = 0.0001), operation time (p = 0.0374), LMR (p < 0.0001), and PLR (p = 0.0189) were significantly associated with a poorer prognosis. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that TNM pStage (p = 0.001) and LMR (p = 0.0007) were independent risk factors for a poorer prognosis. In elderly patients, univariate analysis demonstrated that that TNM pStage (p = 0.0023) was the only significant risk factor for a poor prognosis. LMR was associated with cancer-specific survival (CSS) of esophageal cancer patients after curative esophagectomy. In particular, a low LMR was a significant and independent predictor of poor survival in non-elderly patients. The LMR was convenient, cost effective, and readily available, and could thus act as markers of survival in esophageal cancer.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058637963

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27650456

DOI: 10.1186/s12893-016-0179-5


Related references

Prognostic Importance of Controlling Nutritional Status in Patients Undergoing Curative Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer. American Journal of Therapeutics 25(5): E524-E532, 2016

Preoperative Glasgow Prognostic Score as additional independent prognostic parameter for patients with esophageal cancer after curative esophagectomy. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 43(2): 445-453, 2016

Impact of inflammation-based prognostic score on survival after curative thoracoscopic esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. European Journal of Surgical Oncology 41(10): 1308-1315, 2016

Low invasiveness of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched comparison of operative approaches between thoracoscopic and open esophagectomy. Surgical Endoscopy 32(4): 1945-1953, 2017

Esophagectomy using a thoracoscopic approach with an open laparotomic or hand-assisted laparoscopic abdominal stage for esophageal cancer: analysis of survival and prognostic factors in 315 patients. Annals of Surgery 257(5): 873-885, 2013

Follow-up and recurrence after a curative esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer: the first indicators for recurrence and their prognostic values. Esophagus 7(1): 37-43, 2010

Thoracoscopic-assisted esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: analysis of patterns and prognostic factors for recurrence. Annals of Surgery 252(2): 281-291, 2010

Prognostic value of pre-operative serum uric acid levels in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who undergo R0 esophagectomy. Cancer Biomarkers 17(1): 89-96, 2017

The prognostic factors after radical esophagectomy for esophageal cancer with positive preoperative CEA. Hepato-Gastroenterology 51(55): 159-162, 2004

Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy in the Prone Position Versus the Lateral Position (Hand-assisted Thoracoscopic Surgery): A Retrospective Cohort Study of 127 Consecutive Esophageal Cancer Patients. Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques 27(3): 179-182, 2017

Comparison of thoracoscopic esophagectomy and traditional esophagectomy in radical mediastinal lymphadenectomy for esophageal cancer. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi 17(9): 911-914, 2015

Correlation Between Intense Postoperative Inflammatory Response and Survival of Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Underwent Transthoracic Esophagectomy. Annals of Surgical Oncology 22(13): 4453-4460, 2016

Radical Thoracoscopic Esophagectomy for Elderly Patients with Advanced Esophageal Cancer. Gan to Kagaku Ryoho. Cancer and ChemoTherapy 44(12): 1784-1786, 2018

The relationship between the preoperative systemic inflammatory response and cancer-specific survival in patients undergoing potentially curative resection for renal clear cell cancer. British Journal of Cancer 94(6): 781-784, 2006

The usefulness of three-dimensional video-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy in esophageal cancer patients. Esophagus 2019, 2019