+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Public Opinion Regarding Whether Speaking With Patients About Firearms Is Appropriate: Results of a National Survey

Public Opinion Regarding Whether Speaking With Patients About Firearms Is Appropriate: Results of a National Survey

Annals of Internal Medicine 165(8): 543-550

Health care providers have been encouraged to discuss firearms with patients; whether patients view these discussions as appropriate is unclear. To estimate, in a national sample, the perceived appropriateness of provider discussions about firearms. Probability-based online survey conducted in April 2015. Analyses used survey weights to generate nationally representative estimates. U.S. adults. 3914 English-speaking adults (55% participation rate). Participants were asked, "In general, would you think it is never, sometimes, usually, or always appropriate for physicians and other health professionals to talk to their patients about firearms?" A majority (66% [95% CI, 63% to 69%]) of participants said that it is at least sometimes appropriate for providers to talk to patients about firearms. Specifically, 23% (CI, 20% to 25%) said that provider discussions about firearms were always appropriate, 14% (CI, 11% to 16%) said that they were usually appropriate, and 30% (CI, 27% to 33%) thought they were sometimes appropriate; 34% (CI, 31% to 37%) felt that such discussions were never appropriate. Views varied by firearm ownership: 54% (CI, 52% to 57%) of gun owners said that provider discussions are at least sometimes appropriate, compared with 67% (CI, 62% to 71%) of nonowners living with an owner and 70% (CI, 66% to 74%) of nonowners not living with an owner. Firearm owners who were more likely to think that firearm discussions are at least sometimes appropriate included those with children at home (62% [CI, 57% to 67%]), those who thought that having a gun at home increases suicide risk (75% [CI, 67% to 83%), and those who thought that provider discussions of seat belts are at least sometimes appropriate (73% [CI, 70% to 75%]). The provider discussion question did not specify clinical context. Two thirds of non-firearm owners and over one half of firearm owners in the United States believe that health care provider discussions about firearms are at least sometimes appropriate. The observed heterogeneity underscores the need to better understand assumptions that may underlie these views, particularly among firearm owners. Fund for a Safer Future and Joyce Foundation.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058661275

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27455516

DOI: 10.7326/m16-0739

Related references

Public Opinion Regarding Whether Speaking With Patients About Firearms Is Appropriate: Results of a National Survey. Journal of Emergency Medicine 52(2): 264-265, 2017

Public opinion on alcohol policies in the United States: results from a national survey. Journal of Public Health Policy 21(3): 303-327, 2000

Public Opinion About the Relationship Between Firearm Availability and Suicide: Results From a National Survey. Annals of Internal Medicine 168(2): 153-155, 2017

Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: results from a 2011 national public opinion survey. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 44(2): 158-163, 2013

Public opinion about Alzheimer disease among blacks, hispanics, and whites: results from a national survey. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders 21(3): 232-240, 2007

What Changes Are Occurring in Public Opinion Toward Cancer: National Public Opinion Survey. American Journal of Public Health and the Nation's Health 54: 431-440, 1964

Public opinion on the health benefits of moderate drinking: results from a Canadian National Population Health Survey. Addiction 96(4): 641-649, 2001

The US gun stock: results from the 2004 national firearms survey. Injury Prevention 13(1): 15-19, 2007

National second-opinion network for testicular cancer patients. Results of a user survey. Der Urologe. Ausg. a 52(9): 1290-1295, 2014

Pediatricians' experience with and attitudes toward firearms. Results of a national survey. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 151(4): 352-359, 1997

US Public Opinion on Carrying Firearms in Public Places. American Journal of Public Health 107(6): 929-937, 2017

Speaking Out on Immigration Policy in Australia: Identity Threat and the Interplay of Own Opinion and Public Opinion. Journal of Social Issues 66(4): 653-672, 2010

Continued development of public health in public opinion: results of a representative population survey in Munich, Dresden, Vienna and Bern. Sozial- und Praventivmedizin 48(2): 115-120, 2003

National parks in Western Australia: a public opinion survey. National parks in Western Australia: a ic opinion survey: 57, 1986

Policy implications of a national public opinion survey on abortion in Mexico. Reproductive Health Matters 12(24 Suppl.): 65-74, 2005