+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Public preferences for prioritizing preventive and curative health care interventions: a discrete choice experiment

Public preferences for prioritizing preventive and curative health care interventions: a discrete choice experiment

Value in Health 18(2): 224-233

Setting fair health care priorities counts among the most difficult ethical challenges our societies are facing. To elicit through a discrete choice experiment the Belgian adult population's (18-75 years; N = 750) preferences for prioritizing health care and investigate whether these preferences are different for prevention versus cure. We used a Bayesian D-efficient design with partial profiles, which enables considering a large number of attributes and interaction effects. We included the following attributes: 1) type of intervention (cure vs. prevention), 2) effectiveness, 3) risk of adverse effects, 4) severity of illness, 5) link between the illness and patient's health-related lifestyle, 6) time span between intervention and effect, and 7) patient's age group. All attributes were statistically significant contributors to the social value of a health care program, with patient's lifestyle and age being the most influential ones. Interaction effects were found, showing that prevention was preferred to cure for disease in young adults, as well as for severe and lethal disease in people of any age. However, substantial differences were found in the preferences of respondents from different age groups, with different lifestyles and different health states. Our study suggests that according to the Belgian public, contextual factors of health gains such as patient's age and health-related lifestyle should be considered in priority setting decisions. The studies, however, revealed substantial disagreement in opinion between different population subgroups.

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058661751

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25773558

DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.12.007

Related references

Varying Opinions on Who Deserves Collectively Financed Health Care Services: A Discrete Choice Experiment on Allocation Preferences of the General Public. Inquiry 55: 46958017751981, 2018

Public preferences for interventions to prevent emerging infectious disease threats: a discrete choice experiment. Bmj Open 8(2): E017355, 2018

Improving the public health sector in South Africa: eliciting public preferences using a discrete choice experiment. Health Policy and Planning 30(5): 600-611, 2016

Understanding public preferences for prioritizing health care interventions in England: does the type of health gain matter?. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy 16(2): 81-89, 2011

Public preferences for One Health approaches to emerging infectious diseases: A discrete choice experiment. Social Science and Medicine 228: 164-171, 2019

Prioritising health service innovation investments using public preferences: a discrete choice experiment. Bmc Health Services Research 14: 360, 2015

The Australian public's preferences for emergency care alternatives and the influence of the presenting context: a discrete choice experiment. Bmj Open 5(4): E006820, 2016

The introduction of integrated out-of-hours arrangements in England: a discrete choice experiment of public preferences for alternative models of care. Health Expectations 9(1): 60-69, 2006

The choice and preference for public-private health care among urban residents in China: evidence from a discrete choice experiment. Bmc Health Services Research 16(1): 580, 2016

Patient Preferences for Features of Health Care Delivery Systems: A Discrete Choice Experiment. Health Services Research 51(2): 704-727, 2016

Exploring the social value of health-care interventions: a stated preference discrete choice experiment. Health Economics 18(8): 951-976, 2008

Patient Preferences for Preventive Migraine Treatments: A Discrete-Choice Experiment. Headache 2019, 2019

Patient and health professional preferences for organ allocation and procurement, end-of-life care and organization of care for patients with chronic kidney disease using a discrete choice experiment. Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 25(7): 2334-2341, 2010

Principle, strengths and weaknesses of discrete choice modelling for eliciting public preferences for health care. Revue d'Epidemiologie et de Sante Publique 55(2): 133-139, 2007

Investigating the preferences of older people for telehealth as a new model of health care service delivery: A discrete choice experiment. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare 23(2): 301-313, 2016