+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Quality analyses of the development of preterm infants: results of the Lower-Saxonian preterm infant follow-up project and a comparison group of term infants



Quality analyses of the development of preterm infants: results of the Lower-Saxonian preterm infant follow-up project and a comparison group of term infants



Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualitat Im Gesundheitswesen 109(1): 6-17



Based on perinatal and neonatal quality assurance programmes, a follow-up project for the high-risk group of extremely preterm infants, unparalleled in Germany, was initiated in the federal state of Lower Saxony in 2004. Here we describe the new approach of examining a comparison group of term infants, which, for the first time, allows a valid interpretation of the collection of area-wide long-term outcome data on preterm children. The prospective long-term outcome project investigates the medical care situation for children born at less than 28 weeks of gestation up to school age. Based on the information obtained about the children's development the quality of health care will be optimised. A standardised examining concept with established development tests at defined follow-up intervals (at the age of 6 months, 2, 5 and 10 years) is used. At the age of five years 75 % of the examined premature children exhibited impairments. In order to better assess remarkable results, a comparison group of term infants (n=305) selected by a matched-pairs method was examined at the age of five using an analogous concept in kindergartens in Lower Saxony. The results were compared with the first two age cohorts of the follow-up-project (n=226) and quality analyses performed. As expected, significant differences have been found in the children's motor, cognitive and linguistic development between the preterm and term infants examined. This fact draws attention to the importance of early support for the majority of extremely premature infants. Feedback on the results given to the medical staff involved allows for the implementation of best practices and quality improvements. Identifying potential for improvement in everyday health care will help to develop specific optimisation measures.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058669192

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25839361

DOI: 10.1016/j.zefq.2015.01.002


Related references

Evaluation of care for the preterm infant: review of literature on follow-up of preterm and low birthweight infants. Report from the collaborative Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants (POPS) in The Netherlands. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 6(4): 434-459, 1992

Changes in neonatology: comparison of two cohorts of very preterm infants (gestational age <32 weeks): the Project On Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants 1983 and the Leiden Follow-Up Project on Prematurity 1996-1997. Pediatrics 115(2): 396-405, 2005

Preterm infant follow-up project: a multi-site field experiment of hospital and home intervention programs for mothers and preterm infants. Public Health Nursing 12(3): 171-180, 1995

Palatal development of preterm and low birthweight infants compared to term infants - What do we know? Part 2: The palate of the preterm/low birthweight infant. Head and Face Medicine 1: 9, 2005

Standardised method of follow-up assessment of preterm infants at the age of 5 years: use of the WHO classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps. Report from the collaborative Project on Preterm and Small for gestational age infants (POPS) in The Netherlands, 1983. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology 6(3): 363-380, 1992

Iron status at birth and at 4 weeks in preterm-SGA infants in comparison with preterm and term-AGA infants. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 25(8): 1474-1478, 2013

Preterm infants of lower gestational age at birth have greater waist circumference-length ratio and ponderal index at term age than preterm infants of higher gestational ages. Journal of Pediatrics 161(4): 735-41.E1, 2013

The Fagan test of infant intelligence and visual attention during the FTII Term and preterm infants fed term or preterm formula after hospital discharge. Pediatric Research 35(4 Part 2): 28A, 1994

Development of the intestinal bacterial composition in hospitalized preterm infants in comparison with breast-fed, full-term infants. Pediatric Research 54(3): 393-399, 2003

Impairments, disabilities, and handicaps of very preterm and very-low-birthweight infants at five years of age. The Collaborative Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants (POPS) in The Netherlands. Lancet 338(8758): 33-36, 1991

Functional outcomes and participation in young adulthood for very preterm and very low birth weight infants: the Dutch Project on Preterm and Small for Gestational Age Infants at 19 years of age. Pediatrics 120(3): E587-E595, 2007

A Follow-up Study of Preterm Infants Given Budesonide Using Surfactant as a Vehicle to Prevent Chronic Lung Disease in Preterm Infants. Yearbook of Neonatal and Perinatal Medicine 2010: 117-118, 2010

A follow-up study of preterm infants given budesonide using surfactant as a vehicle to prevent chronic lung disease in preterm infants. Journal of Pediatrics 156(4): 537-541, 2010

Promoting factors of physical and mental development in early infancy: a comparison of preterm delivery/low birth weight infants and term infants. Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine 19(2): 160-171, 2014

The Assessment of Preterm Infants' Behavior (APIB): furthering the understanding and measurement of neurodevelopmental competence in preterm and full-term infants. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews 11(1): 94-102, 2005