+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Quantitative measurement of blood flow in paediatric brain tumours-a comparative study of dynamic susceptibility contrast and multi time-point arterial spin labelled MRI

Quantitative measurement of blood flow in paediatric brain tumours-a comparative study of dynamic susceptibility contrast and multi time-point arterial spin labelled MRI

British Journal of Radiology 89(1062): 20150624

Arterial spin-labelling (ASL) MRI uses intrinsic blood water to quantify the cerebral blood flow (CBF), removing the need for the injection of a gadolinium-based contrast agent used for conventional perfusion imaging such as dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC). Owing to the non-invasive nature of the technique, ASL is an attractive option for use in paediatric patients. This work compared DSC and multi-timepoint ASL measures of CBF in paediatric brain tumours. Patients (n = 23; 20 low-grade tumours and 3 high-grade tumours) had DSC and multi-timepoint ASL with and without vascular crushers (VC). VC removes the contribution from larger vessel blood flow. Mean perfusion metrics were extracted from control and T1-enhanced tumour regions of interest (ROIs): arterial arrival time (AAT) and CBF from the ASL images with and without VC, relative cerebral blood flow (rCBF), relative cerebral blood volume, delay time (DT) and mean transit time (MTT) from the DSC images. Significant correlations existed for: AAT and DT (r = 0.77, p = 0.0002) and CBF and rCBF (r = 0.56, p = 0.02) in control ROIs for ASL-noVC. No significant correlations existed between DSC and ASL measures in the tumour region. Significant differences between control and tumour ROI were found for MTT (p < 0.001) and rCBF (p < 0.005) measures. Significant correlations between ASL-noVC and DSC measures in the normal brain suggest that DSC is most sensitive to macrovascular blood flow. The absence of significant correlations within the tumour ROI suggests that ASL is sensitive to different physiological mechanisms compared with DSC measures. ASL provides information which is comparable with that of DSC in healthy tissues, but appears to reflect a different physiology in tumour tissues.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058676227

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26975495

DOI: 10.1259/bjr.20150624

Related references

Op04 * Quantitative Measurement Of Blood Flow In Paediatric Brain Tumours - A Comparative Study Of Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast And Multi-Timepoint Arterial Spin Label Imaging. Neuro-Oncology 16(Suppl 6): vi16, 2014

A comparative study of perfusion measurement in brain tumours at 3 Tesla MR: Arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI. European Neurology 64(1): 21-26, 2010

A comparison of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI with and without contrast agent leakage correction in paediatric brain tumours. British Journal of Radiology 92(1094): 20170872, 2019

Perfusion MRI of brain tumours: a comparative study of pseudo-continuous arterial spin labelling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging. Neuroradiology 52(4): 307-317, 2010

Combined arterial spin label and dynamic susceptibility contrast measurement of cerebral blood flow. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 63(6): 1548-1556, 2010

Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 228(2): 523-532, 2003

Improving dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI measurement of quantitative cerebral blood flow using corrections for partial volume and nonlinear contrast relaxivity: A xenon computed tomographic comparative study. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 30(4): 743-752, 2009

Comparison of Quantitative Cerebral Blood Flow Measurements Performed by Bookend Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast and Arterial Spin-Labeling MRI in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis. Ajnr. American Journal of Neuroradiology 37(12): 2265-2272, 2016

Comparative analysis of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging for quantitative perfusion measurements of brain tumors. International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Pathology 7(6): 2790-2799, 2014

Regional and voxel-wise comparisons of blood flow measurements between dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) in brain tumors. Journal of Neuroimaging 24(1): 23-30, 2015

Can arterial spin labelling really replace dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion techniques for assessing brain tumours in clinical practice?. Neurology India 65(5): 977-978, 2017

Correlation of 3D Arterial Spin Labeling and Multi-Parametric Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MRI in Brain Tumors. Journal of Medical Investigation 63(3-4): 175-181, 2016

Absolute quantification of cerebral blood flow: correlation between dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI and model-free arterial spin labeling. Magnetic Resonance Imaging 28(1): 1-7, 2010

Quantitative assessment of regional cerebral blood flow by dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MRI, without the need for arterial blood signals. Physics in Medicine and Biology 57(23): 7873-7892, 2012

Prognostic value of blood flow estimated by arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging in high-grade gliomas. Journal of Neuro-Oncology 120(3): 557-566, 2014