+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Reaction Time in a Visual 4-Choice Reaction Time Task: ERP Effects of Motor Preparation and Hemispheric Involvement



Reaction Time in a Visual 4-Choice Reaction Time Task: ERP Effects of Motor Preparation and Hemispheric Involvement



Brain Topography 29(4): 491-505



Reaction time (RT), the most common measure of CNS efficiency, shows intra- and inter-individual variability. This may be accounted for by hemispheric specialization, individual neuroanatomy, and transient functional fluctuations between trials. To explore RT on these three levels, ERPs were measured in a visual 4-choice RT task with lateralized stimuli (left lateral, left middle, right middle, and right lateral) in 28 healthy right-handed subjects. We analyzed behavioral data, ERP microstates (MS), N1 and P3 components, and trial-by-trial variance. Across subjects, the N1 component was contralateral to the stimulation side. N1-MSs were stronger over the left hemisphere, and middle stimulation evoked stronger activation than lateral stimulation in both hemispheres. The P3 was larger for the right visual field stimulation. RTs were shorter for the right visual hemifield stimulation/right hand responses. Within subjects, covariance analysis of single trial ERPs with RTs showed consistent lateralized predictors of RT over the motor cortex (MC) in the 112-248 ms interval. Decreased RTs were related to negativity over the MC contralateral to the stimulation side, an effect that could be interpreted as the lateralized readiness potential (LRP), and which was strongest for right side stimulation. The covariance analysis linking individual mean RTs and individual mean ERPs showed a frontal negativity and an occipital positivity correlating with decreased RTs in the 212-232 ms interval. We concluded that a particular RT is a composite measure that depends on the appropriateness of the motor preparation to a particular response and on stimulus lateralization that selectively involves a particular hemisphere.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058700058

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26830770

DOI: 10.1007/s10548-016-0473-7


Related references

Sequential effects on motor preparation in choice reaction time task An H-reflex and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation study. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 24(1-2): 406, 1998

Overt motor preparation in choice-reaction time task. Perceptual and Motor Skills 47(3 Pt 1): 983-986, 1978

Simple reaction time as a function of preparation for a subsequent choice reaction time task. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 20(1): 45-47, 1982

The effects of alpha-2 agonist, medetomidine and its antagonist, atipamezole on reaction and movement times in a visual choice reaction time task in monkeys. Brain Research Bulletin 44(2): 171-175, 1997

Incremental exercise, plasma concentrations of catecholamines, reaction time, and motor time during performance of a noncompatible choice response time task. Perceptual and Motor Skills 97(2): 590-604, 2003

Neural mechanisms of precuing and motor preparation an EEG study in a two - hand choice reaction time task. Society for Neuroscience Abstract Viewer & Itinerary Planner : Abstract No 822 4, 2003

The additivity of stimulus-response compatibility with perceptual and motor factors in a visual choice reaction time task. Acta Psychologica 105(1): 1-7, 2000

Movement preparation in high-functioning autism and Asperger disorder: A serial choice reaction time task involving motor reprogramming. Journal of Autism & Developmental Disorders 31(1): 79-88, 2001

Behavioral and neurochemical effects of cholinergic deafferentation on visual attention in a 5-choice serial reaction time task. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 25(1-2): 1376, 1999

Event related potentials during a choice reaction time task topography and inter hemispheric relationships. Neuroscience Letters Suppl.(1): S250, 1978

A free, easy-to-use, computer-based simple and four-choice reaction time programme: the Deary-Liewald reaction time task. Behavior Research Methods 43(1): 258-268, 2011

The effects of R-S interval duration on serial choice reaction time: preparation time or response monitoring time?. Ergonomics 23(1): 65-77, 1980

Assessment of attentional function and impulsivity using 5-choice serial reaction time task/3-choice serial reaction time task. Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi. Folia Pharmacologica Japonica 134(3): 137-141, 2009

The behavioral and neurochemical effects of acute and incremental cholinergic lesions on visual attention during a 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 26(1-2): Abstract No -563 1, 2000

Changes of contingent negative variation visual evoked response and reaction time during repeated trials in simple reaction time task. Japanese Psychological Research 17(2): 106-110, 1975