+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Repeated sustained release dinoprostone vaginal inserts in women with unfavorable cervix may increase the risk of postpartum hemorrhage: preliminary results



Repeated sustained release dinoprostone vaginal inserts in women with unfavorable cervix may increase the risk of postpartum hemorrhage: preliminary results



European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 202: 81-82




Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058740360

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27196084

DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2016.04.034


Related references

Sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary with concurrent high-dose oxytocin infusion compared to sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary followed 6 h later by high-dose oxytocin infusion for labor induction in women at term with unfavorable cervix: a randomized controlled trial. Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation 71(1): 32-40, 2011

Oxytocin versus sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary for labor induction of unfavorable cervix with Bishop score ≥ 4 and ≤ 6: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research 39(4): 790-798, 2013

Pre-induction cervical ripening: comparing between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in women with an unfavorable cervix. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 27(18): 1874-1879, 2015

Induction of labor and pain: a randomized trial between two vaginal preparations of dinoprostone in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 24(5): 728-731, 2011

Membrane stripping vs dinoprostone vaginal insert in the management of pregnancies beyond 41 weeks with an unfavorable cervix. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 178(1 PART 2): S30, 1998

Double-balloon catheter vs. dinoprostone vaginal insert for induction of labor with an unfavorable cervix. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics 291(6): 1221-1227, 2015

Membrane sweeping versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in the management of pregnancies beyond 41 weeks with an unfavorable cervix. Journal of Perinatology 19(2): 88-91, 2000

Randomized trial of sustained-release vaginal dinoprostone with concurrent oxytocin versus vaginal misoprostol for induction of labor at term. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 187(6 Supplement): S175, December, 2002

Labor induction in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix: double balloon catheter versus dinoprostone. Journal of Perinatal Medicine 42(2): 213-218, 2014

A prospective randomized trial of labor induction with vaginal controlled-release dinoprostone inserts with or without oxytocin and misoprostol+oxytocin. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics and Gynecology 35(1): 65-68, 2008

Dinoprostone: slow release vaginal insert (Propess) and intracervical gel (Prepidil) for the induction of labour with unriped cervix. Minerva Ginecologica 56(5): 413-418, 2004

Randomized trial of concurrent oxytocin with a sustained-release dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction at term. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 186(1): 61-65, January, 2002

Carbetocin versus oxytocin for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage after vaginal delivery in high risk women. Journal of Maternal-Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 29(4): 532-536, 2016

Carbetocin im injection vs oxytocin iv infusion for prevention of postpartum hemorrhage in women at risk following vaginal delivery. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology 185(6 Supplement): S216, December, 2001

Induction of labour: a comparison between controlled-release dinoprostone vaginal pessary (Cervidil) and dinoprostone intravaginal gel (Prostin E2). Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 48(5): 473-477, 2008