+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Repetition suppression in transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potentials is modulated by cortical inhibition

Repetition suppression in transcranial magnetic stimulation-induced motor-evoked potentials is modulated by cortical inhibition

Neuroscience 310: 504-511

Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) can be applied to modulate cortical phenomena. The modulation effect is dependent on the applied stimulation frequency. Repetition suppression (RS) has been demonstrated in the motor system using TMS with short suprathreshold 1-Hz stimulation trains repeated at long inter-train intervals. RS has been reported to occur in the resting motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) with respect to the first pulse in a train of stimuli. Although this RS in the motor system has been described in previous studies, the neuronal origin of the phenomenon is still poorly understood. The present study evaluated RS in three TMS-induced motor responses; resting and active MEPs as well as corticospinal silent periods (SPs) in order to clarify the mechanism behind TMS-induced RS. We studied 10 healthy right-handed subjects using trains of four stimuli with stimulation intensities of 120% of the resting motor threshold (rMT) and 120% of the silent period threshold for an SP duration of 30 ms (SPT30). Inter-trial interval was 20s, with a 1-s inter-stimulus interval within the trains. We confirmed that RS appears in resting MEPs (p < 0.001), whereas active MEPs did not exhibit RS (p > 0.792). SPs, on the contrary, lengthened (p < 0.001) indicating modulation of cortical inhibition. The effects of the two stimulation intensities exhibited a similar trend; however, the SPT30 evoked a more profound inhibitory effect compared to that achieved by rMT. Moreover, the resting MEP amplitudes and SP durations correlated (rho ⩽ -0.674, p < 0.001) and the pre-TMS EMG level did not differ between stimuli in resting MEPs (F = 0.0, p ⩾ 0.999). These results imply that the attenuation of response size seen in resting MEPs might originate from increasing activity of inhibitory GABAergic interneurons which relay the characteristics of SPs.

Please choose payment method:

(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058740539

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 26427962

DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2015.09.056

Related references

Effect of inter-train interval on the induction of repetition suppression of motor-evoked potentials using transcranial magnetic stimulation. Plos one 12(7): E0181663, 2017

Reliability of Motor Evoked Potentials Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: The Effects of Initial Motor Evoked Potentials Removal. Basic and Clinical Neuroscience 8(1): 43-50, 2017

Onset Latency of Motor Evoked Potentials in Motor Cortical Mapping with Neuronavigated Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation. Open Neurology Journal 9: 62-69, 2015

Prognostic evaluation of patients with severe head injury by motor evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation--combined analysis with brainstem auditory evoked potentials. No to Shinkei 47(5): 491-496, 1995

The first component of polyphasic motor evoked potentials is resistant to suppression by paired transcranial magnetic stimulation in humans. Journal of the Neurological Sciences 159(2): 166-169, 1998

Correlation of transcranial magnetic stimulation tcms direct cortical stimulation dcs and somatosensory evoked potentials sep for mapping of hand motor representation area hmra. Neurology 39(3 Suppl. 1): 375, 1989

Abnormalities of cortical excitability and cortical inhibition in cervical dystonia Evidence from somatosensory evoked potentials and paired transcranial magnetic stimulation recordings. Journal of Neurology 250(1): 42-50, 2003

Transcranial cortical magnetic stimulation of lower-lip mimetic muscles: effect of coil position on motor evoked potentials. Orl; Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and its Related Specialties 61(3): 119-125, 1999

Cortical Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation of the Frontalis Muscle: Characteristic Features and Details on Motor-Evoked Potentials of the Forehead. Orl 63(2): 66-71, 2001

Transcranial Cortical Magnetic Stimulation of Lower-Lip Mimetic Muscles: Effect of Coil Position on Motor Evoked Potentials. Orl 61(3): 119-125, 1999

Cortical transcranial magnetic stimulation of the frontalis muscle: characteristic features and details on motor-evoked potentials of the forehead. Orl; Journal for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and its Related Specialties 63(2): 66-71, 2001

Intracortical inhibition of lower limb motor-evoked potentials after paired transcranial magnetic stimulation. Experimental Brain Research 117(3): 437-443, 1997

Within-subject effect of coil-to-cortex distance on cortical electric field threshold and motor evoked potentials in transcranial magnetic stimulation. Journal of Neuroscience Methods 206(2): 158-164, 2012

The Effect of Etomidate on Motor Evoked Potentials Induced by Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in the Monkey. Neurosurgery 27(6): 936-942, 1990

The effect of etomidate on motor evoked potentials induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation in the monkey. Neurosurgery 27(6): 936-942, 1990