+ Site Statistics
+ Search Articles
+ PDF Full Text Service
How our service works
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Reporting and handling of missing data in predictive research for prevalent undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review



Reporting and handling of missing data in predictive research for prevalent undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review



Epma Journal 6(1): 7



Missing values are common in health research and omitting participants with missing data often leads to loss of statistical power, biased estimates and, consequently, inaccurate inferences. We critically reviewed the challenges posed by missing data in medical research and approaches to address them. To achieve this more efficiently, these issues were analyzed and illustrated through a systematic review on the reporting of missing data and imputation methods (prediction of missing values through relationships within and between variables) undertaken in risk prediction studies of undiagnosed diabetes. Prevalent diabetes risk models were selected based on a recent comprehensive systematic review, supplemented by an updated search of English-language studies published between 1997 and 2014. Reporting of missing data has been limited in studies of prevalent diabetes prediction. Of the 48 articles identified, 62.5% (n = 30) did not report any information on missing data or handling techniques. In 21 (43.8%) studies, researchers opted out of imputation, completing case-wise deletion of participants missing any predictor values. Although imputation methods are encouraged to handle missing data and ensure the accuracy of inferences, this has seldom been the case in studies of diabetes risk prediction. Hence, we elaborated on the various types and patterns of missing data, the limitations of case-wise deletion and state-of the-art methods of imputations and their challenges. This review highlights the inexperience or disregard of investigators of the effect of missing data in risk prediction research. Formal guidelines may enhance the reporting and appropriate handling of missing data in scientific journals.

Please choose payment method:






(PDF emailed within 0-6 h: $19.90)

Accession: 058747043

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 25829972

DOI: 10.1186/s13167-015-0028-0


Related references

A Systematic Review of Methods for Handling Missing Variance Data in Meta-Analyses of Interventions in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. Plos one 11(10): E0164827, 2016

Reporting and handling missing outcome data in mental health: a systematic review of Cochrane systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Research Synthesis Methods 6(2): 175-187, 2015

A systematic review of randomised controlled trials in rheumatoid arthritis: the reporting and handling of missing data in composite outcomes. Trials 17(1): 272, 2016

Quality of missing data reporting and handling in palliative care trials demonstrates that further development of the CONSORT statement is required: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 88: 81-91, 2017

EZSCAN for undiagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos one 12(10): E0187297, 2017

Handling of Missing Outcome Data in Traumatic Brain Injury Research: A Systematic Review. Journal of Neurotrauma 36(19): 2743-2752, 2019

Use of Dental Practices for the Identification of Adults With Undiagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus or Nondiabetic Hyperglycemia: Protocol for a Systematic Review. Jmir Research Protocols 7(11): E11843, 2018

Standards should be applied in the prevention and handling of missing data for patient-centered outcomes research: a systematic review and expert consensus. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 67(1): 15-32, 2014

Primary outcomes reporting in trials of paediatric type 1 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review. Bmj Open 7(12): E014610, 2017

Risk scores based on self-reported or available clinical data to detect undiagnosed type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 98(3): 369-385, 2012

A systematic survey shows that reporting and handling of missing outcome data in networks of interventions is poor. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 18(1): 115, 2018

Reporting, handling and assessing the risk of bias associated with missing participant data in systematic reviews: a methodological survey. Bmj Open 5(9): E009368, 2015

A systematic survey on reporting and methods for handling missing participant data for continuous outcomes in randomized controlled trials. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 88: 57-66, 2017

A review of the reporting and handling of missing data in cohort studies with repeated assessment of exposure measures. BMC Medical Research Methodology 12(1): 96, 2012

A review of the reporting and handling of missing data in cohort studies with repeated assessment of exposure measures. Bmc Medical Research Methodology 12(): 96-96, 2012