+ Site Statistics
References:
54,258,434
Abstracts:
29,560,870
PMIDs:
28,072,757
+ Search Articles
+ Subscribe to Site Feeds
Most Shared
PDF Full Text
+ PDF Full Text
Request PDF Full Text
+ Follow Us
Follow on Facebook
Follow on Twitter
Follow on LinkedIn
+ Translate
+ Recently Requested

Risk contracting and operational capabilities in large medical groups during national healthcare reform



Risk contracting and operational capabilities in large medical groups during national healthcare reform



American Journal of Managed Care 22(6): 441-446



Little is known about the scope of alternative payment models outside of Medicare. This study measures the full complement of public and private payment arrangements in large, multi-specialty group practices as a barometer of payment reform among advanced organizations. We collected information from 33 large, multi-specialty group practices about the proportion of their total revenue in 7 payment models, physician compensation strategies, and the implementation of selected performance management initiatives. We grouped respondents into 3 categories based on the proportion of their revenue in risk arrangements: risk-based (45%-100%), mixed (10%-35%), and fee-for-service (FFS) (0%-10%). We analyzed changes in contracting and operating characteristics between 2011 and 2013. In 2013, 68% of groups' total patient revenue was from FFS payments and 32% was from risk arrangements (unweighted average). Risk-based groups had 26% FFS revenue, whereas mixed-payment and FFS groups had 75% and 98%, respectively. Between 2011 and 2013, 9 groups increased risk contract revenue by about 15 percentage points and 22 reported few changes. Risk-based groups reported more advanced implementation of performance management strategies and were more likely to have physician financial incentives for quality and patient experience. The groups in this study are well positioned to manage risk-based contracts successfully, but less than one-third receive a majority of their revenue from risk arrangements. The experience of these relatively advanced groups suggests that expanding risk-based arrangements across the US health system will likely be slower and more challenging than many people assume.

(PDF emailed within 1 workday: $29.90)

Accession: 058777603

Download citation: RISBibTeXText

PMID: 27355812


Related references

Healthcare reform post AF4Q: a national network of regional collaboratives continues healthcare reform from the ground up. American Journal of Managed Care 22(12 Suppl): S342-S345, 2018

Many large medical groups will need to acquire new skills and tools to be ready for payment reform. Health Affairs 31(9): 1984-1992, 2013

Support for National Health Insurance Seven Years Into Massachusetts Healthcare Reform: Views of Populations Targeted by the Reform. International Journal of Health Services 46(1): 185-200, 2016

Medicare reform: a model for national healthcare reform?. Research Agenda Brief 1996(5): 1-9, 1996

Healthcare resource groups. A more sensitive and less costly approach to contracting. Bmj 308(6936): 1056, 1994

Medical care reform is necessary, but not sufficient, for healthcare reform. Clinical Performance and Quality Health Care 4(3): 164-169, 1996

Reform's new MLR mandates: challenge or opportunity? Healthcare reform will undoubtedly bring its share of challenges, but meeting the new medical loss ratio requirements doesn't have to be one of them. Health Management Technology 32(6): 8-9, 2011

Enhancing pathways & mental healthcare for BME groups: learning between the ideological and operational. International Review of Psychiatry 21(5): 450-459, 2010

Public should have been warned of risk of contracting Ebola at healthcare facilities. Bmj 350: H2770, 2015

Two physician groups proposing their own healthcare reform plans. Modern Healthcare 22(15): 10, 1992

The next reform fight. This time, healthcare groups are taking on GOP as well. Modern Healthcare 28(4): 6, 1999

Doing their part for reform. Many of the Top 25 Women in Healthcare are on the front lines of reform as policymakers work to restructure our healthcare system. Modern Healthcare 39(16): 6-7, 26-30, 1, 2009

The new informatics of national healthcare reform. Behavioral Healthcare Tomorrow 3(1): 11-15, 1993

National healthcare reform--maybe next time?. Trends in Health Care, Law and Ethics 9(4): 27-28, 1994

Prescription for national healthcare reform. American Journal of Managed Care 15(5): 275-278, 2009